I have used both and stuck with Dan's but I can't say exactly why. I had the feeling that it gave me slightly better results but this is in no way supported through data. Maybe I'll take the time and run some tests at this.
50% for both now. To people who haven't tried Dan's. It is the best take my word.
I first tried Tugs and the results were good.
After reading this I tried Dans and the results were better.
But now suddenly all my players have have their arrows down and aren't improving at all.,
How could that be.?
Who's training regime is better. I have both downloaded but would like to know who use's which and how they differ. Which is better for youth?
I make my own too, in fact I have uploaded one as I think that the default training on a striker with rubbish finishing is bad as I want him to score so I make a super finishing striker one.some people sing the praises of using default training. i must say using it does improve your players, but i always make my own schedules as i dont see the point of training strikers in the defensive catergory