The judge is to give his summary on monday. Anything that hasn't already come out about the case may do then. The fact there was a unanimous verdict makes me think the evidence must have been strong. Although of course that is a slightly dangerous assumption to make.
Juries are easily swayed by emotional testimony. If the girl cried and made sure they know that she felt violated by Evans then that's it dust off your hands the crown rests their case. Being an associate I know the arguments for and against juries - this case may be another argument against them.
As I have previously stated I am not saying that Evans is innocent I am just saying that the majority of the evidence doesn't appear to be solid and I'm sure that there will be an appeal. Trust me when I say Evans is not going to get off scott free but I think he will face a lesser sentence or depending on the appeal he might even just have to pay a fine. At that point the female should file a civil suit - Which in my opinion she should have done from the start if she wanted some extra cash to pay for her obvious drinking problem.
Personally I believe that this has gone way over the top solely because he is a footballer. There was a similar case in America last year where American Pro Footballer Ben Rothlesberger allegedly raped a woman in a bathroom stall at a night club. Regardless of his verdict (It was none guilty in the end) he was suspended by the NFL (National Football League) for 3 games (can't remember how many games it was now might have been 6). This is how the FA should deal with players who act not-accordingly to their contracts with particular clubs. But that is another topic for another day.