well done mate, instant results?
well done mate, instant results?
@White Europe better than tete-a-tete?
hey tff, thanks alot for the the tactic, mate can i use harry kane as amc? will he be good at this position?
fun boys are fun boysHAHA! My friend, I want to inform you that you did a huge mistake when you were thinking that way... next time when you be stealing someone tactic at least bother to tweak the set pieces in it. XD
TFF's set pieces are quite unique and it takes a lot of time to set them and I don't know anyone else who uses the same set pieces, I want to stress that I'm talking not just about Corners, I'm talking about all set pieces Corners, Free Kicks and Throw-ins (Attack/Defend) and in your tactics all the set pieces are identical with TFF's set pieces and something like that could happen only in one case when you were just tweaking TFF's tactics...
I see that you are a complete noob in FM that aren't even capable to steal properly and without leaving traces XD
but you use the simulate result or the other?View attachment 1110980View attachment 1110981View attachment 1110982
still very early in testing... but no other tactic yet shown so much potential playing Instant result as this one
but you use the simulate result or the other?
will keep instant resulting later i have no time
Renegade
don't care if you use them or not, just trying to prove a point that you have missed probably duo to your age , won't post here again no worriesI'm wondering what level of insanity a person should have to come to other person thread and advertise own tactic?
You're scaring me, dude... :O
A single thing I don't get, if the version without strikers is better, why put 2 strikers in the version with strikers instead 1, wouldn't that keep more of the "good stuff" from the strikerless version in the tactic - or is that a strange way to think?
A single thing I don't get, if the version without strikers is better, why put 2 strikers in the version with strikers instead 1, wouldn't that keep more of the "good stuff" from the strikerless version in the tactic - or is that a strange way to think?
Mate, I've tried with one STC + 2AMs and it showed weak results, it showed much better results with 3 AMCs or 2 STs + AMC
There's a logical explanation to that but it's a long story.
Of course, I might be wrong and missing something but you always can try it yourself with 1 STC + 2 AMCs
Shall we use Strikers in AMC slot or sell 'em all ?
AMCL should be left foot and AMCR right foot ?