i would try them all, about the time? yea i think its worth it. well i guess if use this ppm your team can be better mateEnough times to be worth trying them all you reckon m8 ? Also, do you reckon the benefits are worth putting all that game time into?
i would try them all, about the time? yea i think its worth it. well i guess if use this ppm your team can be better mate
good luck mateCool, i'll give it a shot as got a few more youngsters in again. Easier to retrain em while they are younger imo
good luck mate
Did you use manual marking with Berserk?The Beserk tactic was matched with 83% win ratio by the 4-2-3-1 for 16.2 patch tactic
Tried the others in here, but none were as good as Berserk.
Berserk got me 5 more league points than the 4-2-3-1 with no losses, but the 4-2-3-1 meant my two strikers got a goal a game, which i prefer than the goals been spread about.
Did you use manual marking with Berserk?
Ok so I think Supernova is better BUT in instant result mode. Devastator V10 is better when you play your games. Now, the difference between the last tactis is thin, so whatever huh.
THANKS TFF, really.
Guys, I don't know why you still use any version of Devastator tactic because Supernova (Attack) is improved version of any Devastator versions.
If you like Devastator becasue of AMC presence then you can use Supernova (Attack) and set the man marking for SS as you do for Devastator V10 and you get better result.
Btw, it might be that Supernova (Attack) with the man marking for SS is better than Supernova (Balanced) V2.