I agree that some writers on the site have posted some stupid transfer rumors. However this article provides many credible arguments and i personally agree with it.
To people who question the goal scoring abilities of the 2. Pele was a striker. Maradona had a free role in which he sat in the hole between midfield and defence. His job was not only to stick the ball in the net unlike pele, but aslo to control the rythm and tempo of a game and provide the killer through balls.
---------- Post added at 05:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:57 PM ----------
I completely agree. The are perhaps on par with each other and the debate on who is better is simply just a matter of opinion. I personally feel maradona was better due to simple fact of watching him destroy teams at mexico 86.
I'd give the edge to Pele, to maintain the form he did over such an extended period is phenomenal. I guess it depends on what you value in a player, each have individual merits to claim to be the greatest ever, so on that basis neither can be argued to be overrated.