Oh yeah of course I understand that, but I don't think this Gaydamak ***** should of ever had the opportunity to get involved with us anyway. The FA should of been more strict on this 'fit and proper' test, Gaydamak may of had the funds but they weren't his, they were his Dad's. His Dad suddenly said, 'I don't want to invest anymore' and Gaydamak is left with nothing and so are we, all we're left with is a poor Russian owner and a **** load of debt. I know the FA have strided to improve that system and slightly have now, but it's happened on 3 occasions to us, 3 occasions! Gaydamak, Al-Fahim and the last one we had, name slips my mind now, Al-Fyad or something? The one who bought it off Al-Fahim anyway.
Did anyone of them really have solid funding we could rely on? No. Gaydamak was funded by his Father who could pull the plug at any time, whether our club knew about this at the time I don't know, so possibly the club should of been more careful itself, but the FA shouldn't be letting a Russian who is funded by his Father (who was actually in prison at the time!) take over a club which could clearly lead to problems.
Leading us onto our "rich arabs"., Al-Fahim promised £50m pumped into the club, he didn't give us a penny and sold up before Christmas, after only taking over in late August/early September. Al Fyad (whatever his name is) comes in, actually gave £30m clearing debts, but then made broken promises to manager Avram Grant, and also sold Begovic and Kaboul for poor prices which cost the club important sums of money. Neither of these two were trustworthy, nor sufficient to run a Premier League club, yet they passed the FA's "fit and proper" test?
I'm sorry, but that's just not good enough.