Anyone noticed how much the coach/scout reports fluctuate? They change so much, it's really annoying.
I found 2 very good young strikers, scouts and coaches said they had potential to be important first team players (4 star). They were both foreign to the English league so I gave them a season on the fringe of the first team and playing most games in the reserves.
Then in their second season they were both 19 and stats looking very good and improved so I gave them more games in the first team. One hits 17 goals and 6 assists in 27 starts and the other hits 20 goals and 10 assists in 30 starts.
After that season they have both dropped to "potential to be a good player" (3 stars). Now what in fresh **** is that about?
I was also looking into signing Balotelli as he was going very cheap and not being played by City. Scouted him to check price and whether he would be recommended by the scouts. Comes back with the report that he "is a quality player" (3.5 stars). This was in January, his conract ran out in the summer. I ended up not signing him, no particular reason, just decided against it. Came to the summer when his contract was up, decided to look into him again. Get another scout report, comes back with "would be a useful signing", (2 stars). How does that work?
Swansea finally approached me after a full season being out, they were struggling, halfway through the season in the bottom 3 but I managed to finish 9th with them. I had a transfer budget of over £16m but we were in the red, but I spent it anyway, bringing in some good, young regens which sent us well in to the red (-£26m) but fortunately, the chairman bailed us out with a £30m loan. Don't know if it's a tycoon that's taken over, I never checked, but to loan that much is ****** brilliant.