TheCelticKid
Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2014
- Messages
- 169
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Sunderlands late push for europe though
Just remove all sugar daddies - makes it fairer and more likely for the finances to remain constant and not receive investments from in game chairmen/board. and perhaps a reverse finance payout at the end of each season based on your last position?
The problem whith reverse pay outs is that it wont effect the middle of the pack so for example a newly promoted team may be better of but a mid table team may be not change at all.
I was considering making the payouts quite significant. Such as £10M for the top 4 and £100M for the promoted teams. And to not make a difference between teams that finish 10th-17th, as it would be silly to hope to get a lower league position just to get funds
I just think it would be interesting if the top teams would actually need to sell players in order to invest, and the lower teams had the funds to buy some more attractive players.
Only work around is to put every team the same rep , then after current deals they will roughly have the same pullI was thinking of a reverse payout, and removing sugardaddies seems reasonable. But there will still be big differences in incomes, as some of the teams (Arsenal, Man City, Man Utd) have enormous sponsorship deals. So might have to consider working around that somehow if it is to be more fair
Finally got access to FM. Will let Znik run the next season as well, and I'll take control after that. Busy with work regarding grad school and internship applications!
When's that next update?
2nd secured.
DO WE HAVE TO WAIT?