So Chelsea fans, does the Kalou incident not match this criteria?
Should Kalou have been sent off???
- Thread starter ecfc2810
- Start date
- Replies 109
- Views 8K
So Chelsea fans, does the Kalou incident not match this criteria?
their is a massive difference. cech had BOTH hands on the ball sorensen had none.
your saying thsat but what if a stoke playr rhad done it to cech today would you bother posting how the stoke player should of been sent off i doubt it very much
Well that shows how little you know, the people on this forum aren't completely biased morons.
yeah but be honest now all the utd supporters saying kalou should of got sent off quite a few of them wouldnt be saying this about lets say fuller if he done it to cech today and i will be honest now i proberly would do the same if a utd player done it to a stoke player lol
leedsfan86
EIEIEIO........
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2009
- Messages
- 409
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
some are........
biased that is not morons
biased that is not morons
never mind his enjoying the match ball insted haha.
The first time I got two foot lunged at, I never played football for a team again, knee ligament damage. Once you show your studs you're basically saying "Who wants hurt"
Actions such as that can not be defended, looks like we have some mentally challenged Chelsea fans on here
Actions such as that can not be defended, looks like we have some mentally challenged Chelsea fans on here
i feel for you but unfortunatly you was just unlucky. the english game as we know is a massive contact sport we love tackles and knowone and deny it.
http://www.d1g.com/video/space/sports/show/?id=3716339
See the goal there.
See the goal there.
We like some force, not excessive force.
Sorry but you are totally wrong, Stoke got beaten by Birmingham 7-0.
Quoted Off Of Wiki: While Stoke had struggled to adjust to playing at the Britannia Stadium visiting teams had no problem and many came away with all three points. One of the home defeated came when Stoke were beaten 7-0 by Birmingham City a result which lead to a pitch invasion by angry supporters. The result stands as Stoke worst home League defeat.
10 January 1998 Birmingham City Britannia Stadium 0–7 14,940
The links here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoke_City_F.C._season_1997–98#Overview
but your missing the point he got the ball 100% sorensen was just unlucky and i hope he returns for the wc.
I personally feel that that was worthy of a red card, he didn't need to use that kind of force, dear lord.
wow someone has some time on their hands. i am impressed by the lenghs you have gone to though mate haha.
D
Deleted member 79730
Guest
I love how biased chelsea fans are, glory hunting idiots dont even know the rules of football
if you used your brain you would know i ment this season
Having seen the goal (Thanks Redders), then I'm inclined to say that I don't think it was a red card offense personally.
He went in two-footed, that much is for certain, however he was fully focused on the ball and barely even made contact with the 'keeper. Perhaps it should have been a yellow card with the goal disallowed, but I think it would have been a harsh decision to send him off for it.
He went in two-footed, that much is for certain, however he was fully focused on the ball and barely even made contact with the 'keeper. Perhaps it should have been a yellow card with the goal disallowed, but I think it would have been a harsh decision to send him off for it.