That's vague. HOW are they going to exploit the flanks? You've now gone from Wide Midfielders to Wingers. Why? What do you actually want/need them to do?
The idea is, we get the ball, we pass it to the creative midfielder who sends the ball to one of the wingers. The winger runs at defence and crosses. Inside the box we'll have a Af/tm/poacher (the role that suites better, i don't care).
This is the first attacking plan, but i want to have another. Here is where my creative striker should be involved. We get the ball, we pass it to creative midfielder linked with my creative striker. Then he can send the ball to the flanks/pass the ball to the other striker or whatever.
Finally, we should have a third plan. Long balls to Af/tm/poacher who is supposed to be able to open space
This is how i've understood simple footbal and didn't explained more because i assumed itl:
1. Try to exploit the flanks
2. Exploit a talented striker
3. Use a big striker with direct football. Depending on how is the match and the specific circumstances, players must choose.
4. Whatever the plan is, pass the ball to the creative midfielder, as soon as posible, who will decide flanks/talented strikter/big man
5. Don't conceed chances
It hasn't. The formation, yes. This way? No. Traditionally, the 442 is attacking down the wings and quite direct. Yours isn't at all. That's not saying it can't work, but you're not direct and you don't have wingers bombing down the line.
Ok. I don't understand why. What roles, duties, TI or whatever i've selected wrong? Attacking down the wings, i have two wings. My passes are not direct, but neither short: combination.
You're setting up as if you want to play a sort of possession style.
What orders i set as if i wanted to play possession?
And the most important: I want solid defence. I don't care if i sacrifice some attacking, but i don't want to conceed chances. 1-0 is ok.
According to this plan, what roles or duties are wrong if i set:
gk,
fb-su cd-de cd-de fb-su
w-su cm-de dlp-su w-su
tm-at false9-su
Let's fix roles and duties first, then we'll talk about TI, PI and OI
The idea is, we get the ball, we pass it to the creative midfielder who sends the ball to one of the wingers. The winger runs at defence and crosses. Inside the box we'll have a Af/tm/poacher (the role that suites better, i don't care).
This is the first attacking plan, but i want to have another. Here is where my creative striker should be involved. We get the ball, we pass it to creative midfielder linked with my creative striker. Then he can send the ball to the flanks/pass the ball to the other striker or whatever.
Finally, we should have a third plan. Long balls to Af/tm/poacher who is supposed to be able to open space
This is how i've understood simple footbal and didn't explained more because i assumed itl:
1. Try to exploit the flanks
2. Exploit a talented striker
3. Use a big striker with direct football. Depending on how is the match and the specific circumstances, players must choose.
4. Whatever the plan is, pass the ball to the creative midfielder, as soon as posible, who will decide flanks/talented strikter/big man
5. Don't conceed chances
It hasn't. The formation, yes. This way? No. Traditionally, the 442 is attacking down the wings and quite direct. Yours isn't at all. That's not saying it can't work, but you're not direct and you don't have wingers bombing down the line.
Ok. I don't understand why. What roles, duties, TI or whatever i've selected wrong? Attacking down the wings, i have two wings. My passes are not direct, but neither short: combination.
You're setting up as if you want to play a sort of possession style.
What orders i set as if i wanted to play possession?
And the most important: I want solid defence. I don't care if i sacrifice some attacking, but i don't want to conceed chances. 1-0 is ok.
According to this plan, what roles or duties are wrong if i set:
gk,
fb-su cd-de cd-de fb-su
w-su cm-de dlp-su w-su
tm-at false9-su
Let's fix roles and duties first, then we'll talk about TI, PI and OI
