2 years, in which you didnt in the CL, then United got the better of Jose and Chelsea, then went on to win 3 in a row, and a CL. You forget the 3rd year under jose was not a big success, and you were not unstoppable then either.
As I was saying under JM Chelsea WERE unstoppable and you cannot disagree with that whatever you say, the current squad now is basically JM's squad, he got the best out of them which no-one else can do. In the summer if Chelsea have a big clear-out and reshape the squad from top to bottom again, we will become great again with the right manager.
When you watched Chelsea under JM they was a joy to watch, now when I watch them there is no creativity, Mata is the only one out there with creativity and I will admit this watching Chelsea at times is dull and painful. Nothing like it was under JM
two years which we won back-to-back titles, that says it all.2 years, in which you didnt in the CL, then United got the better of Jose and Chelsea, then went on to win 3 in a row, and a CL. You forget the 3rd year under jose was not a big success, and you were not unstoppable then either.
two years which we won back-to-back titles, that says it all.
Chelsea need stability , if Roman keeps sacking managers year in year out then they will go nowhere. One of the reasons i think Arsenal are such a fantastic team is because of their faith in the same manager for years. Even when fans were calling for his head , he turned it around and solidified Champions League for another season with a less than impressive squad. Next season we will come back as a powerful force and really challenge for the title, just need a bit of depth.
Ye I agree there but we deserved to win v Barcelona, we would have won it then, Chelsea was added to the list of teams robbed by Barcelona and the referee once again.
two years which we won back-to-back titles, that says it all.
Just because a team wins two titles doesn't make them unstoppable,
How exactly do you know you would have won? Arsenal came within 10mins of beating Barca in the actual final, by your logic, they were the best team in Europe.
Ye but was you robbed? Barca won fair and square v you and yes Arsenal was a top, top team then but didn't win any trophy's.
United are close to winning back to back titles. I support them, and would call them far from unstoppable right now.
two years which we won back-to-back titles, that says it all.
So because you "deserved" to beat us, and Barca "deserved" to beat us, that means you would certainly have beaten us in the final? Get real.
Wigan beat United. United beat Chelsea. I therefore say that Wigan will 100% beat Chelsea. Your logic is amazing.
This is the Arsenal thread right? Awful lot of talk about Chelsea in here.
Oh, winning back to back titles, whilst playing boring, mediocre football does not make you 'unstoppable' - That would be the Arsenal team who went 46 games unbeaten or whatever it was whilst playing great football.
Also, last point, Chelsea need to go through a reshape like there's no tomorrow, it'll be a few years before you're sorted out, and let's be honest, which manager which actually get a few years with Roman there?
This is getting tiresome and well off the Arsenal track.
Yeah its got a bit out of hand here. The football Chelsea played was boring but effective who blames them? Its the winning that counts, who cares about the style of play, picky football fans.
Yeah its got a bit out of hand here. The football Chelsea played was boring but effective who blames them? Its the winning that counts, who cares about the style of play, picky football fans.