The Arsenal Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joss
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 21K
  • Views Views 2M
What does trophies have to do with anything? If Koscielny was Spanish and happened to play with best midfield in the world in Busquets, Iniesta, Alonso, Xavi, best goalkeeper in the world in Casillas, best striker in the world in Torres, he would likely be fresh off multiple-trophy winning campaigns too. Puyol was untouchable back in a day but he's definitely good enough to compete with either Pique or Ramos.

They're relevant because it illustrates that Madrid are a very good team. If you're the best player in a **** team you could still be rubbish, but when you're one of the best players in the best team in the world then you're de facto an outstanding player.

I thought we pretty much established that tackles stat doesn't mean much at all. Its a common phenomenon that with good prediction and game reading (something that Koscielny excels at) tackles go down, because you just don't need to do them as often as the other guys. You know who also had underwhelming amount of tackles per game? Maldini.

Actually, that's still entirely relevant. Maldini didn't tackle much, but when he did he was almost always successful. Koscielny's tackle success percentage is lower than Ramos' this year, therefore it's fair to assume he's not been as good a tackler.

Not to mention the other statistics are still entirely valid, and they get even wider and you can add even more when you include the Champions League, which Ramos thrives in. Koscielny, on the other hand, seems to wilt in the CL.

Right, except I didn't write Ramos as worse. I'd say they're about on par, and certainly neither is so supremely superior to the other that you can genuinely paint one as impeccable gem of modern defending and the other as weak point in the team.

And I'm saying they're clearly not on par. Ramos is not impeccable, but he's clearly better than Koscielny. One would surely assume that if Koscielny really was as good as the man lauded as being one of the two best central defenders in the world he wouldn't still be at Arsenal, but clearly the decision makers agree with me.

I'm not saying Koscielny's bad - he's very good, and one of the better CBs in the Prem - but this weird circlejerk about him being this incredible cerebral central defensive maestro is starting to grate a bit. As a standalone centre-back, Koscielny is very good, an athletic defender with exceptional positioning and ability to read the game. But he's not particularly good in the air (roughly the same aerial duel win rate as Keiran Gibbs last year, natch) and he's prone to the odd brainfart as well as over-aggressive positioning. Everyone knew that Koscielny covered up Mertesacker's weaknesses when they were a partnership, but everyone forgets that Mertesacker did the same for Koscielny. Where Koscielny couldn't win the ball in the air, Mertesacker could. Where Koscielny was impetuous, Mertesacker was measured. They improve each other, but truly great centre-backs are all rounders. Like, say, Sergio Ramos.
 
Campbell one of the best in Prem era imo. Just on a side not, its been good having a proper discussion for a change in another clubs thread without being abused or getting childish!
 
They're relevant because it illustrates that Madrid are a very good team. If you're the best player in a **** team you could still be rubbish, but when you're one of the best players in the best team in the world then you're de facto an outstanding player.

Not really. Plenty of fantastic players didn't win jack squat.


Actually, that's still entirely relevant. Maldini didn't tackle much, but when he did he was almost always successful. Koscielny's tackle success percentage is lower than Ramos' this year, therefore it's fair to assume he's not been as good a tackler.

Not to mention the other statistics are still entirely valid, and they get even wider and you can add even more when you include the Champions League, which Ramos thrives in. Koscielny, on the other hand, seems to wilt in the CL.

Maybe he is, that doesn't mean he has no other qualities that make up for that. Analysing just tackles out of context doesn't mean much. And what other statistcs are you refering too, long pass acurracy? I'll pass.

And I'm saying they're clearly not on par. Ramos is not impeccable, but he's clearly better than Koscielny. One would surely assume that if Koscielny really was as good as the man lauded as being one of the two best central defenders in the world he wouldn't still be at Arsenal, but clearly the decision makers agree with me.

By that logic Gerrard and Carragher were **** because they never moved out of Liverpool and Totti is woeful because he spend entire career in Roma. Sometimes people just stick around.


I'm not saying Koscielny's bad - he's very good, and one of the better CBs in the Prem - but this weird circlejerk about him being this incredible cerebral central defensive maestro is starting to grate a bit. As a standalone centre-back, Koscielny is very good, an athletic defender with exceptional positioning and ability to read the game. But he's not particularly good in the air (roughly the same aerial duel win rate as Keiran Gibbs last year, natch) and he's prone to the odd brainfart as well as over-aggressive positioning. Everyone knew that Koscielny covered up Mertesacker's weaknesses when they were a partnership, but everyone forgets that Mertesacker did the same for Koscielny. Where Koscielny couldn't win the ball in the air, Mertesacker could. Where Koscielny was impetuous, Mertesacker was measured. They improve each other, but truly great centre-backs are all rounders. Like, say, Sergio Ramos.

Are you seriously accusing anyone of defensive brainfarts and too much agression when comparing them to Sergio Ramos?

And no, pretty much all of the best defensive partnerships have people who are complementing each other's strength and covering for each other's weaknesses. Terry and Carvalho. Rio and Vidic. Kosc and Metersacker. The real all-rounders happen once a generation.

I don't see Koscielny's praise as a circlejerk, he is just that good. SI has given him world class with modifiers ever since he joined Arsenal and that doesn't happen on a whim, either.

But most importantly it doesn't make much sense to be lashing at Arsenal's defense when the real problem has been lack of defensive coverage from midfield, something that has been going for couple of years now.

Even the most unpenetrable backlines of last two decades always had world class expert in defensive coverage in front of them. Early 90s Milan had Desailly, 2000s Milan had Gatusso, late 90s-early 2000s Arsenal had Vieira, Mourinho's first stint at Chelsea had Makelele...the list goes on. In the meantime Kosc and Metersacker are 90% of time covered by someone with no defensive skillset whatsoever.
 
I agree with this. Defending should be happening all over the pitch, but without cover even the best back four's are going to get scored on regularly. Particularly when we have such attack-minded midfielders in the team - Ramsey, Cazorla, Wilshere, Ozil etc., there needs to be better balance and defensive cover than that provided by Arteta and Flamini. If Wenger doesn't think this role is required in the modern game, he needs to start proving it
 
I agree with this. Defending should be happening all over the pitch, but without cover even the best back four's are going to get scored on regularly. Particularly when we have such attack-minded midfielders in the team - Ramsey, Cazorla, Wilshere, Ozil etc., there needs to be better balance and defensive cover than that provided by Arteta and Flamini. If Wenger doesn't think this role is required in the modern game, he needs to start proving it
This is the most baffling thing to me, its not like this is something new this season we can all see this for season after season.
 
Not really. Plenty of fantastic players didn't win jack squat.

...that has literally nothing to do with what I'm saying. I'm saying you're very likely to be a very good player if you're one of the best in the best team in the world. That has nothing to do with good players that haven't won anything at all.

Maybe he is, that doesn't mean he has no other qualities that make up for that.

So list them. I'm struggling to find many facets that Koscielny is flat out better than Ramos in, other than his excellent positioning.

Analysing just tackles out of context doesn't mean much. And what other statistcs are you refering too, long pass acurracy? I'll pass.

Koscielny won't, though.

I'll also add that Ramos was dispossessed less and dribbled past less. As a side note, there's an interesting little thing I just found: Koscielny attempted the seventh-most tackles in the Arsenal team last year (sixth, if we take out the outlier that is Kim Kallstrom), which indicates that the whole "he doesn't need to tackle 'cause he positions himself so well" argument is at least slightly flawed. It's also interesting to note that in terms of tackle attempts vs success, he was beaten out by Vermaelen and Carl Jenkinson, and was only very marginally better than Sagna, Mertesacker, Flamini, Serge Gnabry and Jack Wilshere. This year, he's on par with those footballing luminaries Nacho Monreal, Joel Campbell and Wilshere again. Amusingly, he's worse than Hector Bellerin, Danny Welbeck, MESUT OEZIL, Big Per and Olivier Giroud.

By that logic Gerrard and Carragher were **** because they never moved out of Liverpool and Totti is woeful because he spend entire career in Roma. Sometimes people just stick around.

Don't be ******* ridiculous, you're smarter than that. All three of the people you named were local boys who loved their clubs and never wanted to leave. Koscielny was born in central France, and had no ties to Arsenal at all. We both know Gerrard and Totti would've been taken by the top clubs of the world in an instant had they not wanted to stay at their hometown clubs (Carragher probably wasn't quite good enough for that, but the same kind of point would theoretically stand if he was).

Are you seriously accusing anyone of defensive brainfarts and too much agression when comparing them to Sergio Ramos?

Yes. When was the last time Sergio Ramos made a major mistake in an important game? Certainly not last season. He used to be prone to mistakes, but he's worked hard on concentrating and maintaining focus and it has paid dividends. Also, I was referring to positional aggression, not discipline, though Ramos is hardly a saint when it comes to cards.

And no, pretty much all of the best defensive partnerships have people who are complementing each other's strength and covering for each other's weaknesses. Terry and Carvalho. Rio and Vidic. Kosc and Metersacker. The real all-rounders happen once a generation.

Thing is, Rio was an all-rounder at his peak. He legitimately didn't have a weakness. Same goes for the other best current centre-back in the world, Thiago Silva. And Vincent Kompany. And Jerome Boateng. ****, even less-lauded centrebacks like Curtis Davies and James Tomkins are legitimate all-rounders. To say that a centre-back without any glaring weakness is a once in a generational thing is ludicrous, when in reality there's plenty that don't specialise in any part of centre-back play. The same cannot be said of Koscielny, even if he is, overall, a better player than the last two mentioned.

I don't see Koscielny's praise as a circlejerk, he is just that good. SI has given him world class with modifiers ever since he joined Arsenal and that doesn't happen on a whim, either.

They also make him not as good as Sergio Ramos, if we're going to be using the game as gospel.

But most importantly it doesn't make much sense to be lashing at Arsenal's defense when the real problem has been lack of defensive coverage from midfield, something that has been going for couple of years now.

Even the most unpenetrable backlines of last two decades always had world class expert in defensive coverage in front of them. Early 90s Milan had Desailly, 2000s Milan had Gatusso, late 90s-early 2000s Arsenal had Vieira, Mourinho's first stint at Chelsea had Makelele...the list goes on. In the meantime Kosc and Metersacker are 90% of time covered by someone with no defensive skillset whatsoever.

That's a fair point, but I've been very careful to not criticise anything that could be a product of systems here. I've compared purely on the basis of bare bones of centre-back play.
 
Last edited:
I've looked at both sides of this and both of you have points. Sergio Ramos plays in the shortest league in Europe while Kocielny plays in the top 2 tallest. Koscielny is 186 cm tall while Ramos is 183. When Koscielny joined the premier league, he weighed 70kg, much lighter than the 81 KG that Ramos currently weighs. Arsene Wenger brought Koscielny due to his aerial strength, however he had problems being outmuscled by defenders. He now weighs between 75 and 75kg after an intensive weight program. Koscielny is now capable of holding his own against strong strikers. He also has one of the best leaps I've seen in a central defender. Ramos still edges it in terms of strength imo. La Liga is Europe's shortest league, while the Premier league is in the top 2. Forwards in La Liga are minuscule compared to cowards in the premier league. Koscielny had an aerial duel percentage of 52.08% in the league while Ramos had an aerial duel percentage of 68.95% in la Liga. To make the comparison equal, I compared both teams in the champions league. Arsenal had 2 teams with players good in the air, Dortmund and Marseille (massive team). Arsenal also played Bayern in the round of 16 who are also a tall team. Real Madrid made the final so Ramos played more as you would expect. Their numbers are surprisingly comparable. Ramos played 918 min (11 games) while Koscielny played 720 min (8 games). Koscielny had a higher aerial duel rate of 65% compared to Ramos's 57%. By watching Koscielny and Ramos play, they aren't massive but have excellent leaps when coming of the ground. Ramos is marginally stronger. Koscielny is quicker than Ramos we can all safely agree. He clocked 100 in sub 10 seconds in training I've read somewhere. He dominated Suarez and Sturridge last year. Ramos wins and loses more tackles per game in the league. Same story in the champions league. In the leagues, Ramos has a higher duel winning percentage, however Koscielny has a higher duel winning percentage in the champions league. Koscielny commits lesser could per game in all competitions. These stats prove that they are both similar and comparable. Ramos is slightly stronger while they are both pretty similar in the air.
 
Arsene Wenger brought Koscielny due to his aerial strength

...source? That sounds incredibly unlikely.

Forwards in La Liga are minuscule compared to cowards in the premier league.

Both untrue and irrelevant. Falcao's no giant, but he's got a truly impressive leap. As for the size of forwards in La Liga, there are plenty of starting strikers who are over six foot: Mario Mandzukic, Roque Santa Cruz, Joaquin Larrivey, Aritz Aduriz and Imanol Agirrexte to name a few. La Liga is one of the smallest leagues because all of their midfielders are midgets, not their strikers.

Arsenal had 2 teams with players good in the air, Dortmund and Marseille (massive team).

Marseille's tallest player is the same height as Koscielny. Not sure how they're a 'massive team'. Nor Dortmund for that matter. Madrid, on the other hand, had to play Galatasary (Drogba, Yilmaz, Umut Bulut), Juventus (Llorente, Vucinic), Copenhagen (Andreas Cornelius, Felfel, Fanendo Adi), Schalke (Huntelaar, Szalai, Obasi), Dortmund (No real biggun, arguably Lewandowski), Bayern (Mandzukic, Pizarro) and finally Atletico (Diego Costa, Raul Garcia).

Ramos is marginally stronger. Koscielny is quicker than Ramos we can all safely agree.

Not really. Impossible to say.

He clocked 100 in sub 10 seconds in training I've read somewhere.

And Kyle Walker says Kaboul is the quickest player at Spurs, it means nothing unless it can be applied on the pitch.

He dominated Suarez and Sturridge last year.

And Ramos dominated just about everyone. I'm not going to use any specific examples, though, because that'd be silly.

These stats prove

absolutely nothing. There's far too many variables to be using Champions League statistics, and half of your post was just conjecture and hearsay. Stick to the leagues. Stats should be used as an accompaniment to an argument, not the whole basis of.
 
I think you take stats and things you heard too seriously, it's easy to pull out stats that prove your point, but for Christ's sake just watch the game. I still can't imagine how you might think Rosa is top 5 fastest players in our sqaud, he agile but far from top 5.
 
So list them. I'm struggling to find many facets that Koscielny is flat out better than Ramos in, other than his excellent positioning.

Better speed. A lot better concentration and composure which makes him less prone to odd error. Better disciplinary record -. Ramos gives away A LOT of set pieces, 1.9 fouls per game compared to Koscielny's 0.4. That's a drastic difference.


Koscielny attempted the seventh-most tackles in the Arsenal team last year (sixth, if we take out the outlier that is Kim Kallstrom), which indicates that the whole "he doesn't need to tackle 'cause he positions himself so well" argument is at least slightly flawed.

Seventh-most tackles as a first squad defender? Doesn't seem much to me. If anything that reinforces the idea that positioning helps him tackle less.


It's also interesting to note that in terms of tackle attempts vs success, he was beaten out by Vermaelen and Carl Jenkinson, and was only very marginally better than Sagna, Mertesacker, Flamini, Serge Gnabry and Jack Wilshere. This year, he's on par with those footballing luminaries Nacho Monreal, Joel Campbell and Wilshere again. Amusingly, he's worse than Hector Bellerin, Danny Welbeck, MESUT OEZIL, Big Per and Olivier Giroud.

Its equally interesting that he is currently the best in entire Premier League and top 7 in the world at interceptions, and has twice as much as most of Arsenal's defensive players. Like I've said, tackles aren't everything. You can't just isolate that one statistic and write off rest of player's skillset.

Don't be ******* ridiculous, you're smarter than that. All three of the people you named were local boys who loved their clubs and never wanted to leave. Koscielny was born in central France, and had no ties to Arsenal at all. We both know Gerrard and Totti would've been taken by the top clubs of the world in an instant had they not wanted to stay at their hometown clubs (Carragher probably wasn't quite good enough for that, but the same kind of point would theoretically stand if he was).

Maybe, maybe not. Maybe he feels ties with Wenger who jumpstarted his career. Maybe his supermodel wife likes shopping in London. You can't use the fact that he hasn't moved as an argument that he is not good enough, that's absurd. Its not like Arsenal are mug of a club.

Yes. When was the last time Sergio Ramos made a major mistake in an important game? Certainly not last season. He used to be prone to mistakes, but he's worked hard on concentrating and maintaining focus and it has paid dividends.

And when he keeps that up for a few years I will agree that he's improved past it, right now I still keep him as error prone.


To say that a centre-back without any glaring weakness is a once in a generational thing is ludicrous, when in reality there's plenty that don't specialise in any part of centre-back play.

Well of course, what I meant was all-rounder and world class at every element of the game. That was a rare breed of a player in past generations, and nowadays with quality of defensive play consistently droping, its practically extinct. I would only count Hummels and maybe Thiago Silva in that category.


They also make him not as good as Sergio Ramos, if we're going to be using the game as gospel.

Only because the engine is brokekekekkened and promotes physical attributes over mental ones. Yohoho. Seriously though, FM ain't gospel, but they're pretty accurate in describing players abilities, at least on the top level.

That's a fair point, but I've been very careful to not criticise anything that could be a product of systems here. I've compared purely on the basis of bare bones of centre-back play.

Right, guess we can exclude that as an argument for the sake of not driving too much offtopic.
 
Last edited:
Also:

Ramos dominated just about everyone.


Uux0eb2.jpg
 
Ramos is better than Kos in everything except disciplinary record. Ramos record is just abysmal. On the other hand Kos gives away lot of penalties and has as many brain farts.
 
Ramos is better than Kos in everything except disciplinary record.

After 3 pages of wall of text discussion detailing each of their stregnths, that's the best you can come up with?

That's "your mom" level of argument.
 
After 3 pages of wall of text discussion detailing each of their stregnths, that's the best you can come up with?

That's "your mom" level of argument.

I didn't even bother to read.

Poster1: See how many successful tackles CB made
Poster2: Stats don't tell full story. See Maldini for example.

Most arguments are made based on stats which everyone twist in their favor. So not really interested with this **** again as I have done my share many times.
 
I know this counts for nothing but I have asked all mu Arsenal mates for my Saturday and Sunday football teams and mates and work, and they all said they would take Ramos any day not even a choice to make. And that's coming from at least 20+ Arsenal fans. Though they all said KOS is a good defender, which I agree with.
 
With the reports that Cavani is supposedly pushing for a January move, and the news that Real Madrid are looking to offload Bale and Benzema next season to make a push for Aguero and Reus my question to fellow Arsenal supporters is which one would you prefer? Cavani or Benzema? At a push, I'd say Benzema.

I said push way too many times in this post.
 
Back
Top