What does trophies have to do with anything? If Koscielny was Spanish and happened to play with best midfield in the world in Busquets, Iniesta, Alonso, Xavi, best goalkeeper in the world in Casillas, best striker in the world in Torres, he would likely be fresh off multiple-trophy winning campaigns too. Puyol was untouchable back in a day but he's definitely good enough to compete with either Pique or Ramos.
They're relevant because it illustrates that Madrid are a very good team. If you're the best player in a **** team you could still be rubbish, but when you're one of the best players in the best team in the world then you're de facto an outstanding player.
I thought we pretty much established that tackles stat doesn't mean much at all. Its a common phenomenon that with good prediction and game reading (something that Koscielny excels at) tackles go down, because you just don't need to do them as often as the other guys. You know who also had underwhelming amount of tackles per game? Maldini.
Actually, that's still entirely relevant. Maldini didn't tackle much, but when he did he was almost always successful. Koscielny's tackle success percentage is lower than Ramos' this year, therefore it's fair to assume he's not been as good a tackler.
Not to mention the other statistics are still entirely valid, and they get even wider and you can add even more when you include the Champions League, which Ramos thrives in. Koscielny, on the other hand, seems to wilt in the CL.
Right, except I didn't write Ramos as worse. I'd say they're about on par, and certainly neither is so supremely superior to the other that you can genuinely paint one as impeccable gem of modern defending and the other as weak point in the team.
And I'm saying they're clearly not on par. Ramos is not impeccable, but he's clearly better than Koscielny. One would surely assume that if Koscielny really was as good as the man lauded as being one of the two best central defenders in the world he wouldn't still be at Arsenal, but clearly the decision makers agree with me.
I'm not saying Koscielny's bad - he's very good, and one of the better CBs in the Prem - but this weird circlejerk about him being this incredible cerebral central defensive maestro is starting to grate a bit. As a standalone centre-back, Koscielny is very good, an athletic defender with exceptional positioning and ability to read the game. But he's not particularly good in the air (roughly the same aerial duel win rate as Keiran Gibbs last year, natch) and he's prone to the odd brainfart as well as over-aggressive positioning. Everyone knew that Koscielny covered up Mertesacker's weaknesses when they were a partnership, but everyone forgets that Mertesacker did the same for Koscielny. Where Koscielny couldn't win the ball in the air, Mertesacker could. Where Koscielny was impetuous, Mertesacker was measured. They improve each other, but truly great centre-backs are all rounders. Like, say, Sergio Ramos.