you are a city fan who is constantly pro-city, there is no way you can claim to be unbiased
The Chelsea Thread
- Thread starter Ramires
- Start date
- Replies 35K
- Views 3M
you are a city fan who is constantly pro-city, there is no way you can claim to be unbiased
Madridista CR7
Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Okay..maybe a bit but all i said was true. Chelsea have the advantage that they have been competing for a few years now. But thats all.
Oh this was just too big an opportunity to miss.
Au Revoir?
I rofld hard, this has made my day.
Ok City>Chelsea
I mean we have been winning trophies for the past 6 years while City won their first last season... you can argue that they finished level on points with us but we just had our worst season ever and we came closest to taking the title out of all the top clubs, we also had the CL to contend with arguably a much harder competition than the Europa League was for City, we had to content with injuries to key players and our squad is not filled with deadwood on huge wages either and btw our captain does not want to leave us
so right now Chelsea>City... we have better youngsters and we finished higher than them this season whatever you all would like to say and that is also after having our worst ever season under Romans era and also having to contend with Wilkins sacking and a 50m Torres who was bought with Ancelloti's approval and which forced Carlo to drop crucial points trying to bed Torres into the team
And financially City are in the same **** as us
I mean we have been winning trophies for the past 6 years while City won their first last season... you can argue that they finished level on points with us but we just had our worst season ever and we came closest to taking the title out of all the top clubs, we also had the CL to contend with arguably a much harder competition than the Europa League was for City, we had to content with injuries to key players and our squad is not filled with deadwood on huge wages either and btw our captain does not want to leave us
so right now Chelsea>City... we have better youngsters and we finished higher than them this season whatever you all would like to say and that is also after having our worst ever season under Romans era and also having to contend with Wilkins sacking and a 50m Torres who was bought with Ancelloti's approval and which forced Carlo to drop crucial points trying to bed Torres into the team
And financially City are in the same **** as us
Whats the need to come in here slating Chelsea lol, you have your opinions that city are better or the same w.e but you know its going to wind us up.
Each club is unique like everyone of you always remember that kids XD
Each club is unique like everyone of you always remember that kids XD
the squad bit is opinion, but agree the stadium and Sportcity venture is fact ( but it wont get 1bn, thats a very hopeful number thrown out by bluemoon, but that is for another thread)
Also can anyone enlighten me on the conference today?
it just gets frustrating after awhile... I mean if everyone thinks City>Chelsea then surely City are much better than the likes of Arsenal and Liverpool and equal to Man Utd but I dont see any guys going down to their threads to wind them up
sigh no one came in slating chelsea. Why does everyone constantly have their backs up
im not french, and dont care how it spells correctly.. who gives a **** mate;] french sux anyway.
Madridista CR7
Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,453
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Ok City>Chelsea
I mean we have been winning trophies for the past 6 years while City won their first last season... you can argue that they finished level on points with us but we just had our worst season ever and we came closest to taking the title out of all the top clubs, we also had the CL to contend with arguably a much harder competition than the Europa League was for City, we had to content with injuries to key players and our squad is not filled with deadwood on huge wages either and btw our captain does not want to leave us
so right now Chelsea>City... we have better youngsters and we finished higher than them this season whatever you all would like to say and that is also after having our worst ever season under Romans era and also having to contend with Wilkins sacking and a 50m Torres who was bought with Ancelloti's approval and which forced Carlo to drop crucial points trying to bed Torres into the team
And financially City are in the same **** as us
Bigger better stadium for City and Eastlands is a very nice looking place with a good academy and training facilities. And atleast Citys strikers score goals even when they dont want to be there and doesn't waste 50m on huge injury prone flops like Torres.
And the squads avarge age is pretty young and not around 30 like Chelsea. And in no need of a re-build unlike others.
basically same stuff but interestingly...
He said that he wont be making any transfers until he has met the players on the 6th of July however very interestingly he said that he has seen the lub being linked with players and he mentioned Coentara's name, other than that he just tried to doge questions where the reporter would ask him stuff like Are you the Special One II and stuff like that and said that he wants to win trophies with flair and attacking football
And he introduced his backroom staff too:
Just to get you in on that part
Steve Holland will now work with the First-Team
Daniel Sousa and Jose Mario Rocha have been recruited from Porto
Matteo is *** manager
Saying we are like city is an insult, who would want to be like them?
Contrary to belief, I don't believe Jake's French either. Just educated which was the point behind the irony in your post.
Arguably Stamford Bridge is also a very nice-looking place with very good facilities...and honestly the suggestion that City players socre goals in any way is completely irrelevant to our debate
And arguably we have better Youth prospects coming through than you guys do and our average age is not 30, just because few of our key players are ageing does not mean our whole squad has suddenyl become Milan
We got players like Luiz, Ramires, Mikel, Essien, Josh, Kalou, Ivanovic, Cech, PVA, Sturridge who are well below that age
Well City are just like Chelsea were, so are you saying you don't want to be like your own team!?
Right now Chelsea is bigger than City. Chelsea have won **** loads of trophies in the decade and always a threat for the champions league, preforming very well. On the other hand City made it to champions league for the first time after pumping so much money for 3 years. They have won FA cup thats it. On the other hand Chelsea won it many times in the past few seasons.
Financially both are ******. No point in going over that again.
But when someone make a point, instead of debating, people are retorting to childish rants/insults. You know your club is bigger, why not put forth your points..
Andy's point was valid. If Sanchez dont want to sign for City (Meaning rejected huge pay checque) then he would even reject Chelsea who are known to attract players offering huge wages. Yes Chelsea are successful in the recent past but that doesn't mean Sanchez will be dreaming about the prospect of playing for Chelsea.
Financially both are ******. No point in going over that again.
But when someone make a point, instead of debating, people are retorting to childish rants/insults. You know your club is bigger, why not put forth your points..
Andy's point was valid. If Sanchez dont want to sign for City (Meaning rejected huge pay checque) then he would even reject Chelsea who are known to attract players offering huge wages. Yes Chelsea are successful in the recent past but that doesn't mean Sanchez will be dreaming about the prospect of playing for Chelsea.
tbh if you compared this Thread to other Team Discussion Threads, you would understand why Mike.. you dont see 2 many opposition fans over there stirring an arguement while you see the same ones going around in circles here
fair enough. but this is another kind of education, its a foreign language?
Im talkin about football education my friends;]
Finally a sensible post, some of the points being mentioned like Eastlands is a very nice-looking place that have good Facilities made me laugh, yea Bridge is a total dump I forgot
Glad someone still has their brain scrwed on tight
First of all I think Chelsea are still better than City, but for it to stay like that we need to bring in younger players into our starting XI otherwise they'll easily catch up over this next season because our squad will be too old.
Secondly, BlueHeart stop acting so acting like a little kid. He has a right to an opinion (as does everyone) and if he thinks City are better than us then so be it. It doesn't mean you have to press the caps lock (as you ALWAYS do) and start raging. Not sure if you work or not; but if you talk to a customer/colleague like that just because you disagree with them then you'll be sacked straight away.
Secondly, BlueHeart stop acting so acting like a little kid. He has a right to an opinion (as does everyone) and if he thinks City are better than us then so be it. It doesn't mean you have to press the caps lock (as you ALWAYS do) and start raging. Not sure if you work or not; but if you talk to a customer/colleague like that just because you disagree with them then you'll be sacked straight away.
Last edited: