The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
Bigger better stadium for City and Eastlands is a very nice looking place with a good academy and training facilities. And atleast Citys strikers score goals even when they dont want to be there and doesn't waste 50m on huge injury prone flops like Torres.

And the squads avarge age is pretty young and not around 30 like Chelsea. And in no need of a re-build unlike others.

Bigger stadium counts for fuckall when you can see half empty stadium even when the ticket prices are cheaper than many clubs..

And Ironic that City fan is talking about wasting talent. Lol..
 
Saying we are like city is an insult, who would want to be like them?

If you want to take it like an insult thats your issue, but the manner of spending from both sides, their methods in the market, their recent rises, the manner in which they are funded, the issues they face with the FFPR, their current CL standing; are all similar, although Chelsea still have the upper hand in recent trophies. But in terms of someone signing from outside, there isnt much difference between the two
 
Arguably Stamford Bridge is also a very nice-looking place with very good facilities...and honestly the suggestion that City players socre goals in any way is completely irrelevant to our debate

And arguably we have better Youth prospects coming through than you guys do and our average age is not 30, just because few of our key players are ageing does not mean our whole squad has suddenyl become Milan

We got players like Luiz, Ramires, Mikel, Essien, Josh, Kalou, Ivanovic, Cech, PVA, Sturridge who are well below that age

Maybe....but City have invested alot in the youth academy and facilities in the past 3 years. And now they have started to sign good young promising players to their academy. Karim Rekik, Denis Suarez etc...and are in talks of signing many young players. Bit like Chelsea...altought Chelseas success under Frank Arnesen wasn't very good.

And your spine is old...Lampard, Terry, Drogba, Cech has been your spine for several years and their all something like 33. Some young players but you need to rebuild.
 
First of all I think Chelsea are still better than City, but for it to stay like that we need to bring younger players into our starting XI otherwise they'll easily catch up over this next season because our squad will be too old.

Secondly, BlueHeart stop acting so acting like a little kid. He has a right to an opinion (as does everyone) and if he thinks City are better than us then so be it. It doesn't mean you have to press the caps lock (as you ALWAYS do) and start raging. Not sure if you work or not; but if you talk to a customer/colleague like that just because you disagree with them then you'll be sacked straight away.

the signings of Luiz and Ramires were the first stages of acknowledging that imo. Interested to see what step AVB will take now
 
Maybe....but City have invested alot in the youth academy and facilities in the past 3 years. And now they have started to sign good young promising players to their academy. Karim Rekik, Denis Suarez etc...and are in talks of signing many young players. Bit like Chelsea...altought Chelseas success under Frank Arnesen wasn't very good.

And your spine is old...Lampard, Terry, Drogba, Cech has been your spine for several years and their all something like 33. Some young players but you need to rebuild.


Cech is 29 ;) and he can go on for another 7 years if he wants 2... Drogba is going to be phased out by Torres, Terry has a natural sucessor in Brums or Luiz and Lamps, well we are looking for a new CM or Josh is always there
 
Right now Chelsea is bigger than City. Chelsea have won **** loads of trophies in the decade and always a threat for the champions league, preforming very well. On the other hand City made it to champions league for the first time after pumping so much money for 3 years. They have won FA cup thats it. On the other hand Chelsea won it many times in the past few seasons.

Financially both are ******. No point in going over that again.

But when someone make a point, instead of debating, people are retorting to childish rants/insults. You know your club is bigger, why not put forth your points..

Andy's point was valid. If Sanchez dont want to sign for City (Meaning rejected huge pay checque) then he would even reject Chelsea who are known to attract players offering huge wages. Yes Chelsea are successful in the recent past but that doesn't mean Sanchez will be dreaming about the prospect of playing for Chelsea.


WITh CHELSEA HE COULD BE CAPABLE OF WINNING THINGS INCLUDING CL, WHILE WITH CITY HE COULD ONLY DREAM ABOUT IT TILL HIS CAREER IS OUT.

cmon guys, i know you know it, and everybody knows it. be objective ffs. yea, i see you are utd fan, and i cant believe you could be objective, but still, try it sometimes, it can work.
 
basically same stuff but interestingly...


He said that he wont be making any transfers until he has met the players on the 6th of July however very interestingly he said that he has seen the lub being linked with players and he mentioned Coentara's name, other than that he just tried to doge questions where the reporter would ask him stuff like Are you the Special One II and stuff like that and said that he wants to win trophies with flair and attacking football

And he introduced his backroom staff too:

Just to get you in on that part

Steve Holland will now work with the First-Team

Daniel Sousa and Jose Mario Rocha have been recruited from Porto

Matteo is *** manager

I knew someone would ask him if he was the special one II, that just shows the ignorance of some journalists
 
If you want to take it like an insult thats your issue, but the manner of spending from both sides, their methods in the market, their recent rises, the manner in which they are funded, the issues they face with the FFPR, their current CL standing; are all similar, although Chelsea still have the upper hand in recent trophies. But in terms of someone signing from outside, there isnt much difference between the two
I was joking, obviously my poor attempt at a joke didn't work.
I know we are similar but I'd prefer to talk about all things Chelsea in the Chelsea thread rather than City being better or the 'Your players are all old you need to rebuild' argument. Don't get me wrong i love a good debate but sometimes it takes the cake!
 
First of all I think Chelsea are still better than City, but for it to stay like that we need to bring in younger players into our starting XI otherwise they'll easily catch up over this next season because our squad will be too old.

Secondly, BlueHeart stop acting so acting like a little kid. He has a right to an opinion (as does everyone) and if he thinks City are better than us then so be it. It doesn't mean you have to press the caps lock (as you ALWAYS do) and start raging. Not sure if you work or not; but if you talk to a customer/colleague like that just because you disagree with them then you'll be sacked straight away.

alright then, never realised that you have to sit on a chair and stay calm when you are being insulted like this.
from now on, i will try being self-controlled. whatever. i was taught to defend myself when im being insulted.
 
I was joking, obviously my poor attempt at a joke didn't work.
I know we are similar but I'd prefer to talk about all things Chelsea in the Chelsea thread rather than City being better or the 'Your players are all old you need to rebuild' argument. Don't get me wrong i love a good debate but sometimes it takes the cake!


I agree with him, we have nothing against anyone really but these same arguements have been visit and revisted over and over again to the point that it has become boring , you would hardly see the same number of such debates on other Team discussiion threads that y most Chelsea members on this site get irritated when the issue comes up again in any form or way, I mean we just appointed a great new assistant manager and we have totally redeveloped our backroom yet no one has really visited that topic yet
 
alright then, never realised that you have to sit on a chair and stay calm when you are being insulted like this.
from now on, i will try being self-controlled. whatever. i was taught to defend myself when im being insulted.

How old are you? Its not a dig or insult. Its a genuine question.. Few make sarcastic comments on avg age of FM Base..
 
I agree with him, we have nothing against anyone really but these same arguements have been visit and revisted over and over again to the point that it has become boring , you would hardly see the same number of such debates on other Team discussiion threads that y most Chelsea members on this site get irritated when the issue comes up again in any form or way, I mean we just appointed a great new assistant manager and we have totally redeveloped our backroom yet no one has really visited that topic yet

in fairness the same topics spring up on all threads. we just spend 50m, people still question as to whether we have any money. In fairness andy seemed to asking in relation to the sanchez debate

Liking AVB even more after the conference, any word on if he is bringing Falcao?
 
in fairness the same topics spring up on all threads. we just spend 50m, people still question as to whether we have any money. In fairness andy seemed to asking in relation to the sanchez debate

Liking AVB even more after the conference, any word on if he is bringing Falcao?
He's said no deals until hes seen all the players I think so that won't be till mid July, going to be a quiet few weeks if so.
 
I agree with him, we have nothing against anyone really but these same arguements have been visit and revisted over and over again to the point that it has become boring , you would hardly see the same number of such debates on other Team discussiion threads that y most Chelsea members on this site get irritated when the issue comes up again in any form or way, I mean we just appointed a great new assistant manager and we have totally redeveloped our backroom yet no one has really visited that topic yet

Mate, this debates happen coz some of you lot dont respond properly for any point raised in this thread, instead retort of childish insults.

See for ex. this happened when Andy said there was not much difference between Chelsea and City and he made few points. You lot could have countered with valid points instead of turning on CAPS and saying U ******* KIDDING ME, CHELSEA DA BEST, WITH CHELSEA THEY HAVE THE BEST CHANCE TO WIN THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE..
 
alright then, never realised that you have to sit on a chair and stay calm when you are being insulted like this.
from now on, i will try being self-controlled. whatever. i was taught to defend myself when im being insulted.

He wasn't insulting you! But even when you're not being 'insulted' you still constantly use caps lock and overuse exclamation marks, I always read your comments like you're screaming - it's unnecessary and so is your language.
 
Mate, this debates happen coz some of you lot dont respond properly for any point raised in this thread, instead retort of childish insults.

See for ex. this happened when Andy said there was not much difference between Chelsea and City and he made few points. You lot could have countered with valid points instead of turning on CAPS and saying U ******* KIDDING ME, CHELSEA DA BEST, WITH CHELSEA THEY HAVE THE BEST CHANCE TO WIN THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE..

if you are quoting me here, look again.
 
Mate, this debates happen coz some of you lot dont respond properly for any point raised in this thread, instead retort of childish insults.

See for ex. this happened when Andy said there was not much difference between Chelsea and City and he made few points. You lot could have countered with valid points instead of turning on CAPS and saying U ******* KIDDING ME, CHELSEA DA BEST, WITH CHELSEA THEY HAVE THE BEST CHANCE TO WIN THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE..

Please don't say you lot when referring to BlueHeart, that guy doesn't represent us all with his horrid caps and language!
 
How old are you? Its not a dig or insult. Its a genuine question.. Few make sarcastic comments on avg age of FM Base..

I'd also like to know, if you're over 13/14 then you really need to grow up...no offence.
 
madridsta and sunil, take your city debate to VM or a city thread if there is one
 
Back
Top