Please don't say you lot when referring to BlueHeart, that guy doesn't represent us all with his horrid caps and language!
as a true blue fan, at least i have the guts to oppose myself to someone. but that was history anyway. im new.
Please don't say you lot when referring to BlueHeart, that guy doesn't represent us all with his horrid caps and language!
Please don't say you lot when referring to BlueHeart, that guy doesn't represent us all with his horrid caps and language!
I'd also like to know, if you're over 13/14 then you really need to grow up...no offence.
madridsta and sunil, take your city debate to VM or a city thread if there is one
what now? i am a kid to you ? ;p
what now? i am a kid to you ? ;p
No, it's just you don't act like you're 24.
Mate, this debates happen coz some of you lot dont respond properly for any point raised in this thread, instead retort of childish insults.
See for ex. this happened when Andy said there was not much difference between Chelsea and City and he made few points. You lot could have countered with valid points instead of turning on CAPS and saying U ******* KIDDING ME, CHELSEA DA BEST, WITH CHELSEA THEY HAVE THE BEST CHANCE TO WIN THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE..
if you are quoting me here, look again.
People seem to have gone off track regarding Andy's 'question' about Chelsea - City. It wasn't about them being similar at the moment, it was about Sanchez and if he woudn't go to City why would he go to Chelsea.
Well firstly, Chelsea are more established than City in the past few years. Continuously challenge on all fronts every year whilst City have just got into the top 4. Could that not sway his decision if he had to pick between the two clubs?
Secondly, AVB's fresh approach he's said to be bringing to Chelsea with attacking football may make him favour Chelsea as that's what he most admired about Barcelona.
But you can also argue that City's future is looking bright and they will also be challenging for honours every year, but we don't know that yet.
It wasn't about which team is bigger/better at the moment. Of course that comes into play when a player is choosing is choosing a team, but you have all gone way off the point.
In fairness Zola played good football first season, not his fault the Hammers players couldnt give two *****
On the Sanchez situation. Is there much difference between City and Chelsea? Both good squads, both playing champions league and both capable of paying big wages. If he doesn't want to join City would he want to join Chelsea?
Maybe....but City have invested alot in the youth academy and facilities in the past 3 years. And now they have started to sign good young promising players to their academy. Karim Rekik, Denis Suarez etc...and are in talks of signing many young players. Bit like Chelsea...altought Chelseas success under Frank Arnesen wasn't very good.
And your spine is old...Lampard, Terry, Drogba, Cech has been your spine for several years and their all something like 33. Some young players but you need to rebuild.
in fairness the same topics spring up on all threads. we just spend 50m, people still question as to whether we have any money. In fairness andy seemed to asking in relation to the sanchez debate
Liking AVB even more after the conference, any word on if he is bringing Falcao?
no word yet
And although I agree wtih you Mike the point is how some people approach these respective topics by saying stuff like Chelsea will be ****** in 5 years etc. That will surely get under your skin if your a Chelsea fan
I rreally dont mind similar topics such as FFP, ageing squad coming up again and again but I would really appreciate it if people approached the topic in a more sensible manner
it goes both ways