The Chelsea Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ramires
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 35K
  • Views Views 3M
I would also say Drogba is 5 years older, Aging more and more each day, Clearly doesnt want to be at Chelsea anymore, by his who attidude and the fact this is the club Torres wanted to be at, yet he looks as Miserable as anything, not scoring goals and playing total wank, no matter what you claim, i havent seen a good full 90 minutes from him in an chelsea shirt yet.

Age means nothing and you know that, Drogba was 32 last season and won golden boot in the PL and helped Chelsea to the double if you remember?? And we want Torres to be ****** off because that means he cares. Like i said earlier i think i can saftely say you havent watched every minute he has played in a Chelsea shirt unlike me who has and many Chelsea supporters who arnt getting on his back because his performances have been pretty good.
 
Thought you said age means nothing?? And we want Torres to be ****** off because that means he cares. Like i said earlier i think i can saftely say you havent watched every minute he has played in a Chelsea shirt unlike me who has and many Chelsea supporters who arnt getting on his back because his performances have been pretty good.

And i can safely say as a Chelsea Supporter your view on his performance are going to be slightly biased, and as Cjacko11 your views on him are going to be very biased.... Age doesnt mean he has lost his ability, it means he consistently will struggle to hit it... He doesnt look ****** off, more feeling sorry for himself, the same look he had at Liverpool.
 
And we want Torres to be ****** off because that means he cares.

The difference being 2 seasons ago, if Torres was ****** off he would out muscle a defender, skin him for pace and bang it in the bottom corner leaving the keeper with no chance.

Now if Torres is ****** off, he will get petulant and just whinge at the referee/opposition/his team mates.
 
And i can safely say as a Chelsea Supporter your view on his performance are going to be slightly biased, and as Cjacko11 your views on him are going to be very biased.... Age doesnt mean he has lost his ability, it means he consistently will struggle to hit it... He doesnt look ****** off, more feeling sorry for himself, the same look he had at Liverpool.

I like to think my view is shared by people who actually watch every minute he plays not people who watch the odd minute or two on MOTD. If my views were so biased i would say Malouda has been great lately and the same goes for Drogba and Lampard etc but i havent.

The difference being 2 seasons ago, if Torres was ****** off he would out muscle a defender, skin him for pace and bang it in the bottom corner leaving the keeper with no chance.

Now if Torres is ****** off, he will get petulant and just whinge at the referee/opposition/his team mates.

He isent getting the service simple as that. As soon as Benayoun and Torres were re-united on Saturday he knew exacly where to run etc. Like i keep saying and its getting ridiculous, there is a reason why big signings are mostly done in the summer and thats so the new player can adapt to his new team and get little partnerships going in the off season.
 
I like to think my view is shared by people who actually watch every minute he plays not people who watch the odd minute or two on MOTD. If my views were so biased i would say Malouda has been great lately and the same goes for Drogba and Lampard etc but i havent.

Yet your claiming Torres has been good, which everyone inside, outside and around football simply dont agree with.... Mmmm... Well yeah i think your opinion is biased, and your proving it with this defense of Torres.
 
Yet your claiming Torres has been good, which everyone inside, outside and around football simply dont agree with.... Mmmm... Well yeah i think your opinion is biased, and your proving it with this defense of Torres.

His performances have been good yes. Im saying it because i beleive it to be true not because im biased. I know when a player is playing **** for Chelsea and i dont hide it. Like i keep saying you havent watched every minute of his Chelsea career and if you had then you would say he has done alright and goals arnt far away.
 
His performances have been good yes. Im saying it because i beleive it to be true not because im biased. I know when a player is playing **** for Chelsea and i dont hide it. Like i keep saying you havent watched every minute of his Chelsea career and if you had then you would say he has done alright and goals arnt far away.

And as i keep saying, you are a chelsea fan, you are naturally going to look for the positives rather then the negative( whether you realise it or not) but hey ho, i know i would rather take the opinions off proffessionals and expects are some baised chelsea fan with form... Thanks but i know Torres has been **** for you.
 
The Utd youngsters you names have all been in and around the Utd first team for what 2-3 years now so they are fully expirenced at the top level. But the young lads at Chelsea with the exception of Sturridge all came through this summer and wearnt used to being in and around the first team and playing week in week out. Thats why we sent them out on loan in January so they can gain first team expirience and come back better and nearer to the finished article.

Sorry, but that is completely untrue. Hernandez and Smalling both came into the United squad this season, and both have had instant impact. Bebe also joined United this season, he hasn't had the same impact, but clearly has talent for the future.

McEachran has been at Chelsea since 2008, but he is still too young and not good enough to warrant a place in the squad. Bertrand has also been at Chelsea since 2005, but again he still isn't good enough. You will find this is pretty much the same for all of the young players you are talking about, so not quite sure what your point was.

I think you should question Chelsea's reckless transfer policies.
 
Last edited:
And as i keep saying, you are a chelsea fan, you are naturally going to look for the positives rather then the negative( whether you realise it or not) but hey ho, i know i would rather take the opinions off proffessionals and expects are some baised chelsea fan with form... Thanks but i know Torres has been **** for you.

Like i say i admit when players are playing poorly for my club. Back in the day i admit i was different and would fight every corner but i think many will agree i have changed my view on Chelsea and most things i say are agreed with because i tell the truth. I have no worries about Torres what so ever.
 
Like i say i admit when players are playing poorly for my club. Back in the day i admit i was different and would fight every corner but i think many will agree i have changed my view on Chelsea and most things i say are agreed with because i tell the truth. I have no worries about Torres what so ever.

and thats why your club is not challenging for major owners this year, because chelsea 12 months ago wouldnt of standed for Torres performance... Oh well. You had your run at the top i suppose, hope you enjoyed, cheers for coming. Polish our trophies on the way out.
 
Sorry, but that is completely untrue. Hernandez and Smalling both came into the United squad this season, and both have had instant impact. Cleverley and Bebe also joined United this season, both haven't had the same impact, but both clearly have talent for the future.

McEachran has been at Chelsea since 2008, but he is still too young and not good enough to warrant a place in the squad. Bertrand has also been at Chelsea since 2005, but again he still isn't good enough. You will find this is pretty much the same for all of the young players you are talking about, so not quite sure what your point was.

I think you should question Chelsea's reckless transfer policies.

Cleverly was in Utd team last season no? Bebe is just not good enough for the money Utd payed (question Utd tranfer policy ay)? I was on about playes like Rafael, Fabio and Gibson etc. McEachran would have been 15 in 2008 so that tells me all i need to know from you mate. Bertrand is not good enough but the recent crop i.e Van Aanholt, Kakuta, McEachran and Bruma are good enough but needed first team expirence hence with the exception of McEachran why they all went on loan in January.

---------- Post added at 10:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:41 PM ----------

and thats why your club is not challenging for major owners this year, because chelsea 12 months ago wouldnt of standed for Torres performance... Oh well. You had your run at the top i suppose, hope you enjoyed, cheers for coming. Polish our trophies on the way out.

Haha we aint going nowhere and you know it. Enjoy the title because i did last season. The fact i have even seen Chelsea win the PL is enough for me.
 
Ah, but your owner's not patient enough to be with the young chaps. He'd rather buy 27/28 year olds for 15 million.
 
Haha we aint going nowhere and you know it. Enjoy the title because i did last season. The fact i have even seen Chelsea win the PL is enough for me.

Shame you never see them lift the European Cup. Eh?
 
Last edited:
Sorry I didn't meant to write Cleverley, but either than that I'm right. Yes Chelsea has lots of real youngsters, just as United does, but the difference is United at the current moment in time HAS young players who are ready and do play in the first team RIGHT NOW, Chelsea DON'T. Oh and just for the record I'm not a United fan, this is just the easiest comparison of the two biggest teams in England. I guarantee you that pretty much all the players you've named won't ever play for Chelsea's first team, apart from maybe Sturridge and 1/2 others.
 
Ah, but your owner's not patient enough to be with the young chaps. He'd rather buy 27/28 year olds for 15 million.

Well he did in the summer, they just wearnt ready yet and needed more playing time somewhere else.

Shame you never see them life the European Cup. Eh?

Wouldnt bother me if i didnt. Im not a glory hunter and never thought i would see Chelsea at this level. I count myself extremley lucky and enjoy every season whether we win silverwere or not.
 
Sorry I didn't meant to write Cleverley, but either than that I'm right. Yes Chelsea has lots of real youngsters, just as United does, but the difference is United at the current moment in time HAS young players who are ready and do play in the first team RIGHT NOW, Chelsea DON'T. Oh and just for the record I'm not a United fan, this is just the easiest comparison of the two biggest teams in England. I guarantee you that pretty much all the players you've named won't ever play for Chelsea's first team, apart from maybe Sturridge and 1/2 others.

Darren Gibson's poor if that's one you're referring to. Bebe also looks like a major waste of money. Obertan doesn't look to have many any progress either, but being a Liverpool fan I dunno about any other possible United youths.
But our youth players >
;)
 
Wouldnt bother me if i didnt. Im not a glory hunter and never thought i would see Chelsea at this level. I count myself extremley lucky and enjoy every season whether we win silverwere or not.

Enjoy the season though mate.. When Roman leaves, well you know the drill.
 
Sorry I didn't meant to write Cleverley, but either than that I'm right. Yes Chelsea has lots of real youngsters, just as United does, but the difference is United at the current moment in time HAS young players who are ready and do play in the first team RIGHT NOW, Chelsea DON'T. Oh and just for the record I'm not a United fan, this is just the easiest comparison of the two biggest teams in England. I guarantee you that pretty much all the players you've named won't ever play for Chelsea's first team, apart from maybe Sturridge and 1/2 others.

Utd have the players down in the u18s who are talented but not ready yet.. Morrison is a real jem, Paul Pogba, Corry Evans out on loan at Hull looks very good indeed, rated higher then Jonny was at that age. Will Keane is another one.
 
Ah, but your owner's not patient enough to be with the young chaps. He'd rather buy 27/28 year olds for 15 million.

Sorry I didn't meant to write Cleverley, but either than that I'm right. Yes Chelsea has lots of real youngsters, just as United does, but the difference is United at the current moment in time HAS young players who are ready and do play in the first team RIGHT NOW, Chelsea DON'T. Oh and just for the record I'm not a United fan, this is just the easiest comparison of the two biggest teams in England. I guarantee you that pretty much all the players you've named won't ever play for Chelsea's first team, apart from maybe Sturridge and 1/2 others.

But if Sturridge and 1/2 others make it from our acadamy surely thats not a bad result. Van Aanholt for me will make it and so will McEachran but im not 100% sure about Kakuta and Bruma yet. All my point was is that the likes of Fabio and Rafael have been in and around the Utd first team for 2-3 years now but the Chelsea crop only came through at the back end of last season or in the summer if we are talking about McEachran.
 
Back
Top