I don't really get the hate for the Pato deal. We got him in as our 2nd/3rd striker, but in the time it's taken for him to get fit, Traore has really proven himself worth that spot and so now we don't need him. Very little harm done.
Its not that the deal has done us any harm. It just shows there are serious problems with our recruiting process. By all accounts, we got Pato because our current strikers had fitness and injury issues. Yet Pato himself took 6 weeks to get up to speed. So he really could not have fulfilled the purpose we got him for
Which really beggars the question on what exactly was the thought process behind buying him. These are questions we have really been asking since the summer. Something is wrong with the way we conduct transfer business