Chelski Shogun
Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 1,353
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Deserved win, and a decent performance to go with it. LOL at Conte, Costa grabs the winner and Conte starts hugging random fans in celebration. Brilliant.
Deserved win, and a decent performance to go with it. LOL at Conte, Costa grabs the winner and Conte starts hugging random fans in celebration. Brilliant.
Someone should tell Conte he beat West Ham, not Barcelona.
The third Friday night in September is gonna' be as fun watching the benches as it will be the action on the pitch with Conte and Klopp side by side the small area at Chelsea.
So many matchups this season. Just for us:
Conte vs Wenger, Mou, Klopp, Pep etc. I suspect Conte vs Poch might end in a high octane knife fight.
Tonight also presented us with an interesting problem.
Matic, Kante, Oscar, Willian is way too defensive a midfield. It crushes opposition play but there is so little impact there that we're totally reliant on Costa making something out of nothing or Hazard sparkling. Teams can just put 2/3 players on the latter, and mark Costa tightly and we sort of run out of steam. Pedro offers a good option for that, but if Cuadrado is off, I'd like to see a more creative right winger brought in or, against teams that sit as deep as West Ham did, see Oscar, Kante, Fabregas, or, switching to a 4-4-2 with Oscar and Kante in the middle. That last goal came precisely because Costa had a partner beside him and was freed from the tight marking he'd been under all night.
There's a lot of talk about us signing Ricardo Rodriguez from Wolfsburg, moving Azpi to RB and then using Brana as a rotation option for CB, as our current CB targets don't seem to be working out. Apparently this would be a stopgap until January.
It reads a little iffily on paper, but comes with a caveat. We'd be using the £60m odd we offered to Napoli to buy James instead. What would people be more happy with: RR and Koulibay, or RR and James? I weirdly find myself leaning towards the latter. Hazard-Matic-Kante-Oscar-James for games when the opposition has weaker fullbacks / Hazard-Matic-Kante-Fabregas-Willian for games where they have stronger attacking wings/weaker in the middle / Hazard-Oscar-Kante-Fabregas-James to crush teams that sit back against us.
Not to mention the fact that he can play through the middle as well. and is a consistent goal threat from midfield, something we have been sorely lacking.
Chelsea were very average but definitely deserved 3 points imho though
absolutely dominated the game and with some sharpness in the finishing would have had it wrapped up in the 1st half, when we watched what we did last season that performance was not average!!!!
I only got to read about 5 lines of the second one as I don't have a subscription to the WSJ![]()
Don't they allow a certain number of free articles per month? I had no problem reading it despite having no subscription either!
You looked good until you broke the deadlock, Hazard looked terrific, Oscar impressed me, Costa tried a little burst here and there, Kante was Kante, but other than that... And yes you controlled the game, but you were allowed to against cagey side, same as us (United) in our opening game against Bournemouth, West Ham set up that way, and only for a very good late strike from a player who shouldn't have been on the pitch, West Ham's ****** and grab strategy would've worked and they would have came away with a very good point.
As I said, I recognise you that you deserved the 3 points, as West Ham were much too unadventurous for a side who has European ambitions, and you did create decent chances, but I just felt you were asking for West Ham to score the way your lot took their foot off the gas after going 1-0 up, West Ham rarely threatened all night so I don't much risk in going for a 2nd goal at home, against a side who weren't at the races, and that's why I described it as rather average. If United, City, Liverpool, Arsenal, etc had a smaller team against the ropes at home, after going 1-0 up, do you think they'd sit back and try hold out almost an entire half for 1-0? Batter them, get the fear factor back at the bridge, or perhaps I'm a little old fashioned.