means **** all if there not being put away but pool v bvb would be 1 **** of a game
.
that was a good game but this dortmund are something eles i am just saying stats mean fuckall win 4-3 or 1-0 still the same 3 points4 at Arsenal. 4 against the Champs Leicester. 2 at Chelsea. 8 over two League Cup games. What more do yer want? (H).
And it was one **** of a game.
Good games but Liverpool have had too many freak games. No real analysis can be drawn thus far. For example, expected goals including penalties at the Emirates were 1.4 - 1.5. This clearly didn't warrant the scoreline of 3-4. Watching the goals again, all of the goals were low probability. Walcott's goal at 1:30 is a low probability shot which would be saved by a keeper most of the time. However, the finish is incredibly accurate. Same to be said about Coutinho's free kick at 2:35. Lallana's goal at 3:10 is another low probability one as he's dribbling away from goal at a tight angle. Cech's unnecessary rushing out gifts Lallana a goal. Coutinho's goal at 3:40 was the best chance created in the game. Clyne puts an excellent cross central and close to goal. Mane's goal at 3:35 is another freak goal from a low probability position though. An incredible finish. The 5:05 goal by Oxlade-Chamberlain wasn't a particularly good chance. Although the ball was deflected, the average keeper would save that the vast majority of the time. 5:35 was from a set piece and a very good glancing header by Calum Chambers although not a great chance.4 at Arsenal. 4 against the Champs Leicester. 2 at Chelsea. 8 over two League Cup games. What more do yer want? (H).
And it was one **** of a game.
some 1 makes them up so internet nerds look like thay know something only stat that matters is won lost drew win more that any 1 eles you win end of
They aren't rubbish. They are based upon what's happened in the past. For example, Andros Townsend is an eye friendly player. Elite dribbler with a high shot volume until you see his shooting locations.
Models do take these into account. Opta have their own model and they explain it perfectly in this presentation. There's data on how teams react to scoring and conceding e.g. Arsenal shut down after going +2/3 goals. Of course the accuracy depends on the amount of variables considered by the model. My point is that definitive conclusions on Liverpool's likely season are way too early.
whos been making definitive conclusions all you have been saying is if you carry on the way you have started then you will be on for a good season internet kids and there buzz words
It depends on what's seen as a good season. Based on so far, you could have a run at the top 4. It depends on whether falling short is a failure or success. The talk of winning the title and being arguably the most feared team in England were a bit too ambitious imo. We just need to see another 5 match days.
give it a rest will you every 1 who follows a top team thinks there team will win it whats wrong with that
