Word talk.
That argument is a complete paradox, as hyperbole is commonly defined as: "exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally." The only way you can justify it in any way is with a verbose stream of semiotics and linguistic relativity, but even then it only works in a theoretical context. There's also little reason to, apart from to be contrary, as justifying it would rather imply that there is some merit to that kind of usage. That's a hard case to make: it's a decidedly inelegant method of expression, a bit like double negatives. I'd be happy to discuss it further in PMs if you want.
On topic.
With Hererra being so dynamic, what do guys think you will do in terms of a holder? Is a Kagawa + Hererra partnership strong enough defensively?
He wants one more CM, who will no doubt be strong defensively. Fletcher has looked sharp so far actually