What are you on about? I'm talking about the loan system as a tool of development. You literally couldn't have read that more wrong unless you were trying to. It doesn't matter whether they could be a super star or probably not good enough: if at that age you're trying to develop their technical skills, sending them somewhere based on physicality will not develop them. You're neglecting a core skills which means they won't be the best players they can be, whether they go on to be a premier league player or a league 2 player. 18-21 they need to be getting regular match time with their core skills. So they need to be playing where that helps them. So a loan is not the be all and end all
You're mad about and entirely different point.
And teams shouldn't be reliant on loans anyway. That's a sign of a broken system and terrible lower club management.
The loan system has become a bloated mess rather than the supplementary support it was supposed to be. Some teams now
actively neglect having full squads to get youngsters from above to miminise costs. That's unsustainable