Scouseinthehouse
Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2015
- Messages
- 21,855
- Reaction score
- 4,895
- Points
- 113
But it's not 'moot' when it comes to football is it? You pay that money for game changers. Until they dominate/ change the very biggest of games, it's always going to be an issue.
'Dabbing' against Fenerbache and co is one thing. Against Chelsea, City, L'pool etc is a complete other.
Until he shows that potential ability consistently in the biggest of tests, the fee is always going to be an issue.
If you weren't paying for that it wouldn't of been paid.
*Edit* The fella has terrific potential. Anyone would be stupid to not see that. But you can't separate the fee from that until it's consistently fulfilled to justify it.
'Dabbing' against Fenerbache and co is one thing. Against Chelsea, City, L'pool etc is a complete other.
Until he shows that potential ability consistently in the biggest of tests, the fee is always going to be an issue.
If you weren't paying for that it wouldn't of been paid.
*Edit* The fella has terrific potential. Anyone would be stupid to not see that. But you can't separate the fee from that until it's consistently fulfilled to justify it.
Last edited: