The Old Firm In England?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kris
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 231
  • Views Views 23K

Should the Old Firm move to England?

  • Yes

    Votes: 76 32.1%
  • No...It's The English Premiership for a reason

    Votes: 71 30.0%
  • Maybe if they start from the bottom up

    Votes: 45 19.0%
  • We should just have a UK league.

    Votes: 45 19.0%

  • Total voters
    237
lets put this simply, the SPL is an absolute joke, celtic and rangers have dominated that league for years, every now and again a team like Hearts or Aberdeen challenges them but it doesnt happen often, this is backed up by the fact SPL players cannot cut it in the prem except for Stiliyan Petrov, eg Shaun Maloney Georgios Samaras cannot cut it in the prem, the spl is the equivalent of the championship

You obviously know nothing about Scottish football, and just judge it by what you've seen on football manager. What a **** outlook that must be. So Petrov is the only player to have cut it at the highest level after being in Scotland? Are you forgetting, Gattuso, Arteta, Larsson, Hartson, Chris Sutton? Plus loads of others. Yeah Maloney failed at Villa but that wasn't a surprise, I've never rated him.. And Samaras was at City before Celtic so you haven't made any point in saying that.. Any Celtic or Rangers player could be in a top side.. Just because the old firm is in a terrible league mindless people assume they are only worthy of the Championship.. It's stupid.
 
Appreciate that Aannddyy. Good to see some honesty after all the simple minded idiots on here.
 
There are some very arrogant people on this thread forgetting about scottish footballs achievements,they need to have a look at their own teams before casting judgement!!!

Thanks for the backup Aannddyy!!:)
 
You obviously know nothing about Scottish football, and just judge it by what you've seen on football manager. What a **** outlook that must be. So Petrov is the only player to have cut it at the highest level after being in Scotland? Are you forgetting, Gattuso, Arteta, Larsson, Hartson, Chris Sutton? Plus loads of others. Yeah Maloney failed at Villa but that wasn't a surprise, I've never rated him.. And Samaras was at City before Celtic so you haven't made any point in saying that.. Any Celtic or Rangers player could be in a top side.. Just because the old firm is in a terrible league mindless people assume they are only worthy of the Championship.. It's stupid.

Again... its really not a terrible league. Two teams dominate the title chase... in England, 4 teams dominate the title chase. In most countries a few teams dominate the honors. Scotland is no different. The quality of the league overall is very good. Its a second/third tier league. Id say first rate leagues are England, Spain and Italy, then the 2nd tier is France and Germany... Scotland is a step behind that... probably on par with the Portuguese league or Dutch league. There are a lot of leagues looking up at Scotland. Its one of the top 10-15 in the world.
 
to be honest this is the worst the old firm have been in a while imo maybe its a case of other teams getting better but they just dont seem like the threat they were 5-6 years ago i would put them in the championship first rather than epl just to see how well they would do
 
I dont like the idea of a UK league as this would take away all the national teams identities and Fifa would then want a GB national team. I feel sorry for scottish football that it always seems to be Rangers and Celtic winning the honours but it is a weak league with little money and the two Glasgow clubs I think will fail in the EPL as they would not be strong enough to qualify for Europe on a regular basis as they do now.
 
to be honest this is the worst the old firm have been in a while imo maybe its a case of other teams getting better but they just dont seem like the threat they were 5-6 years ago i would put them in the championship first rather than epl just to see how well they would do
The lack of money means that the old firm can't really buy top players and can't really afford players from other scottish clubs,hence the others gettin stronger and starting to catch up with them,this year the Gers only signed Rothen whilst Celtic went all French on us so not a lot of activity between the clubs in the SPL!Hibs can go top if beat us on saturday and the way we are playing it's very realistic!
 
No offence, but please do be serious. Jealous? The only way Rangers and Celtic would get the standard of players that English teams do is if Rangers and Celtic played in the premier league. That shows it's only going to benefit them and no other english teams, if anything it will damage mid table premier league teams chances of signing a player if Rangers and Celtic are in their league. So no, it's not jealousy, it's common sense. And they don't have bigger fans bases, it just seems it because they are in a league with "smaller" teams than them, yeah so there is some other good teams like Hibernian, Hearts, Dundee etc, but Rangers and Celtic only seem like big teams because they are consistantly challenging for the title in Scotland. Fulham, West Ham, Aston Villa and Wigan are all better teams and don't bother saying why aren't they in Europe because the premier league is of a much higher standard.

im sorry but are you crazy? i cant speak for rangers but BAR Man Utd there is no bigger team than celtic in the EPL... we got something like 12million fans, we aint just some jokey scots team, we got huge fanbases in America, Canada, Australia, Ireland, now Japan and China, and possibly korea soon as we got a korean on the way, we'll see how it goes. also not forgetting our fanbase in scotland and england also. oura attendances have falled to about 56000 which is poor, but alot of our fans who live near celtic park live in some of the poorest areas of the UK, but untill this season we got 60000 every week for st mirren, hamilton etc, we could easily upgrade our stadium to 80k and get full houses. Honestly, if you were getting the same wages, who would u play for, Wigan, Fulham, West Ham, **** Everton, Spurs, Villa, or celtic.


Also, the SPL would absolutely thrive if this happened, there would be bigger gates, i mean the other spl clubs rip their fans off and charge £30 for games against the old firm, imagine Aberdeen V Hearts in a title decider, it would be a full house. Aberdeen, Hearts , Hibs would easily get 30000 fans attending if not more, as long as they had some sort of TV income.
 
i wouldnt compare everton spurs and villa to celtic they are established clubs in the epl im not saying celtic wouldnt survive in the epl but dont get carried away its a very tough league and if you were in the epl now with the form your having yous would be lucky to be out of the relegation zone but honestly good luck if you do ever get there
 
Yes we and Rangers should be given 2-3 seasons and make it a UK league,
Celtic & Rangers have the fans and with money tv rights and all that jazz
in about 3-5 seasons they could challenge imo
Although im Scotish and proud so DONT let football in Scotland die XD
 
im sorry but are you crazy? i cant speak for rangers but BAR Man Utd there is no bigger team than celtic in the EPL... we got something like 12million fans, we aint just some jokey scots team, we got huge fanbases in America, Canada, Australia, Ireland, now Japan and China, and possibly korea soon as we got a korean on the way, we'll see how it goes. also not forgetting our fanbase in scotland and england also. oura attendances have falled to about 56000 which is poor, but alot of our fans who live near celtic park live in some of the poorest areas of the UK, but untill this season we got 60000 every week for st mirren, hamilton etc, we could easily upgrade our stadium to 80k and get full houses. Honestly, if you were getting the same wages, who would u play for, Wigan, Fulham, West Ham, **** Everton, Spurs, Villa, or celtic.


Also, the SPL would absolutely thrive if this happened, there would be bigger gates, i mean the other spl clubs rip their fans off and charge £30 for games against the old firm, imagine Aberdeen V Hearts in a title decider, it would be a full house. Aberdeen, Hearts , Hibs would easily get 30000 fans attending if not more, as long as they had some sort of TV income.
Lol another mindless post. Just because you have a bigger fan base doesn't mean your bigger than any other team. The way Celtic are playing at the moment they don't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as "Premier League". And yeah once again, YOU would thrive, there's no bonus for English football so why should we let it happen? All it would do is cause confusion and there is no point for it. Hearts, Hibernian and Dundee are catching you up in my opinion and I would worry about your position in YOUR league, and stop moaning and whining about how you want to come into this league. I would choose any of the Premier League teams that you mentioned over Celtic any day, they are all proven Premier League teams and all you are is a team that struggles to beat Hamilton (No offence to Hamilton fans :)).

---------- Post added at 10:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:50 AM ----------

Yes we and Rangers should be given 2-3 seasons and make it a UK league,
Celtic & Rangers have the fans and with money tv rights and all that jazz
in about 3-5 seasons they could challenge imo
Although im Scotish and proud so DONT let football in Scotland die XD
Once again, it only benefits YOUR two teams. Not ours. No need for you in our leagues.
 
im sorry but are you crazy? i cant speak for rangers but BAR Man Utd there is no bigger team than celtic in the EPL... we got something like 12million fans, we aint just some jokey scots team, we got huge fanbases in America, Canada, Australia, Ireland, now Japan and China, and possibly korea soon as we got a korean on the way, we'll see how it goes. also not forgetting our fanbase in scotland and england also. oura attendances have falled to about 56000 which is poor, but alot of our fans who live near celtic park live in some of the poorest areas of the UK, but untill this season we got 60000 every week for st mirren, hamilton etc, we could easily upgrade our stadium to 80k and get full houses. Honestly, if you were getting the same wages, who would u play for, Wigan, Fulham, West Ham, **** Everton, Spurs, Villa, or celtic.


Also, the SPL would absolutely thrive if this happened, there would be bigger gates, i mean the other spl clubs rip their fans off and charge £30 for games against the old firm, imagine Aberdeen V Hearts in a title decider, it would be a full house. Aberdeen, Hearts , Hibs would easily get 30000 fans attending if not more, as long as they had some sort of TV income.
For real? So you think Celtic is better supported than Liverpool and Arsenal...?

No way in ****.
 
Yes. Certainly better supported than arsenal. and the 12 million he was talking about was an estemate done in 2002 before we reached the UEFA Cup final, reached the last 16 of the Champions league and signed Nakamura.
 
For real? So you think Celtic is better supported than Liverpool and Arsenal...?

No way in ****.

erm... you clearly dont know what you are talking about. yes we have the shittest team we have had in years but we are still a much bigger club than arsenal, liverpool, chelsea etc.

even Sir Alex Ferguson has said many times himself, you have Man Utd, Barcelona, Real Madrid, then Celtic and Rangers...

i cant speak for rangers, and celtic have more fans than them, but as Div said that estimate of about 10 or 12 million fans was made pre-UEFA cup final, Pre-Artur Boruc and Zurawski (as a result we have large fanbase in poland), pre-Nakamura (now big fanbase in japan) and pre-Zheng Zhi which could add a fanbase in china. sorry mate but Liverpool or Arsenal couldn't touch us, thats why there is a theory that celtic would be challenging man utd within 4 or 5 seasons, as we are already a global brand,.
 
celtic are not bigger than arsenal and chelsea and liverpool
 
celtic are not bigger than arsenal and chelsea and liverpool

whatever you say ;)


maybe we have different definitions than big. okay, we have more fans than arsenal, chelsea or liverpool, we are more successful (in a **** league, i'll save you the comeback!), we are a global brand with Supporters clubs all over the world in America, Canada, Scotland, England, Ireland, Poland, Japan, China, Slovakia, Spain, Germany, U.A.E, Australia, Wales, in fact lets see, i'll copy the offical thing


UK, USA, Spain, Tunisia, Australia, U.A.E, Germany, Malta, Ireland, Canada, Israel, Austria, Thailand, Nigeria, Gibraltar, Romania, Bahrain, Switzerland, Holland, Turkey, Norway, Russia, Luxembourg, Croatia, Peru, Belgium, Italy, Malaysia, New Zealand, Venezuela, Iceland, France, Brazil, Oman, Serbia & Montenegro, India, Sweden, Singapore, Uruguay, Japan, South Africa, Lebanon, Mexico, Egypt, Lithuania, Finland, Morocco, Georgia, Kuwait, Hong Kong, Philippines, Liechtenstein, Saudi Arabia, Greece, Portugal, Cyprus, Colombia, Slovakia, Singapore, Czech Republic, Macedonia, China, Argentina, Canary Islands, Hungary, Indonesia, Bahrain, Latvia, Albania, Brunei, Nicaragua, South Korea, Ukraine, New Caledonia, Azerbaijan, Senegal, Mauritius, Pakistan, El Salvador, Iran, Chile, Bosnia, Benin, Guatemala, Estonia, Taiwan, Jordan, Barbados, North Republic of Cyprus, Fiji, Bulgaria, Bermuda, Qatar, Ivory Coast, Niue. Armenia, Libya, Burkina Faso, Slovenia, Yugoslavia, Puerto Rico, Gambia, Mauritius, Ghana, Vietnam, Kenya, Kazakhstan, Namibia, Cayman Islands, Jordan, Cambodia, Colombia, Mozambique, Trinidad & Tobago, Sudan, Palestine, Bangladesh, Angola, Ethiopia, Grenada, Netherlands Antilles,, Aruba, Monaco, Sri Lanka, Botswana, Tajikistan, Djibouti, Gabon, Malawi, Tanzania, Dominica Rep, St Lucia, Bhutan, Macao, Swaziland, Andorra, Antigua & Barbuda, Nepal, Virgin Islands, Seychelles, Faroe Islands, Guam, Vatican City, Cape Verdi, Togo, Mongolia, Congo (146)



look , you can look down on the SPL, but just because your league is full of money at the moment, doesn't mean these clubs are bigger or better.
 
im sure arsenal,liverpool,chelsea have more fans than celtic

and they are better than them end off really
 
im sure arsenal,liverpool,chelsea have more fans than celtic

and they are better than them end off really



you are sure?? sorry but you are wrong..

as i saiD, Yeh Arsenal, Liverpool and Chelsea have better teams currently but they dont have more fans i'm afraid mate:)...

i feel like we are going in circles, so never mind, but we do have more..... we got a bigger ground that arsenal (by like 300 seats), liverpool or chelsea and up untill the last few games where we have been poor we filled it 60300 against st mirren, hamilton etc ;), and 12 million fans was the last estimate which has almost definately gone up to at least 15or so million fans (due to added fanbases in Japan, Poland, China (and possibly korea soon))... sorry but bar man utd, barcelona or real madrid in europe there isnt many with that many fans let alone in the EPL oO)

i think its kind of fact that we have more fans than any team in EPL bar Man Utd.....

but whatever, our team is **** currently, prob mid table prem currently which aint good enough.
 
Back
Top