Total and utter ****.
I just thank god that Chelsea signed RDM on a permanent basis or else we would have had to deal with Redknapp to Chelsea rumours... Horrible
So are you going to tell me that if Spurs qualified for the CL then Harry wouldn't still be in a job? At least elaborate.
I'm telling you that theres a good chance he would have still been sacked. Redknapp and Levy didn't get on at all, he was offered a massive new deal in March but rejected it (for England). He's then gone back in with a new agent demanding the same deal he rejected months back. Its Redknapps fault he's out of a job, he played his hand badly.
Oh and 'Bottom line, if Chelsea didn't win the CL, Harry would be hailed as the messiah.' Is a crock of ****.
I'm telling you that theres a good chance he would have still been sacked. Redknapp and Levy didn't get on at all, he was offered a massive new deal in March but rejected it (for England). He's then gone back in with a new agent demanding the same deal he rejected months back. Its Redknapps fault he's out of a job, he played his hand badly.
Oh and 'Bottom line, if Chelsea didn't win the CL, Harry would be hailed as the messiah.' Is a crock of ****.
But lets face it, how on earth Redknapp did not get the England job was ridiculous. All the media and most of the public wanted him, whether it was right or wrong.
He didn't get it because media and public aren't the ones choosing the next boss. Overall in short term I think Roy will be better choice for England and will most likely defend England through the group which is achievement in itself.
No it is not an achievement to get out of this group, we are England, we have better players than Sweden and Ukraine who are pretty poor sides. How you can think this is not good, admittedly the squad picked is all wrong though. Hodgson's tactics are suited to playing against better teams, but when we face Sweden and Ukraine that same approach should not be taken. We have to be the team on the front foot, controlling the game.
I just think it is sickening how Redknapp did not get it in the first place to be honest, Hodgson is alright but quite a boring choice and the way we play demonstrates that.
Redknapp would of got Chelsea playing good football, I do not see how anyone can criticise his time at Spurs. They were much better than you in the league despite having a huge dip at one point, if the rules were better they would be in the CL.
Well if that's the case then I just don't know how high your lots expectations really are. Did you expect to win the league or something? Harry wanted a long term contract for job security which I think is fair enough considering the job he has done. Christ sake you were in the relegation zone when he took over, massive underperformance to get that low admittedly but that's a fact.
Your club will regret it.
It is not sickening at all that Redknapp didnt get it. Hodgson has an outdated plan, but Redknapp has no plan at all. Bearing in mind that the remit of the england manager is more than just the tournaments.
Redknapp tried to force a deal through on the one chairman who takes no ****.
The fact that he got them out of relegation 4 years ago, is now somewhat irrelevant. Its about building on what they have now, and redknapp doesnt seem to have what it takes to move them further.
Neither Sweden or Ukraine are poor sides, lets get that straight.
Hmmm.... My only question is... Who is Noel Edmonds meant to be?