No, he said that he wil discuss his future at the club if Spurs did not get CL which they did not. Might be the best time for him to move because Spurs are not exactly guaranteed Top 4 next season and they will likely be losing a few key players rather than adding world-class talent although whether Levy will let him is a different matter
The Tottenham Hotspur Thread
- Thread starter Billy
- Start date
- Replies 958
- Views 92K
No, he said that he wil discuss his future at the club if Spurs did not get CL which they did not. Might be the best time for him to move because Spurs are not exactly guaranteed Top 4 next season and they will likely be losing a few key players rather than adding world-class talent although whether Levy will let him is a different matter
No I am sure I've seen that he was happy to stay at Spurs after that saga with him leaving if Spurs don't get CL football.
dont take that at face value, he had to come out and say he was happy to avoid causing rifts in the dressing room
Less time on his contract? How many years does he have left?
craig curtis
Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2010
- Messages
- 2,834
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Some i think will be in line- ole,blanc,jose,pep,giggs/moyes
Bale is replacable but by no means an easy task. Good luck replacing Modric though (if he leaves), one of the best regista's in the world.
Despite his agent insisting he is happy.
4 years. Theres no reason to accept less than 35m
We're not Arsenal, they were forced into it by Fabregas only wanting to go to Barca, we all know that. We could, but why would we? 4 years left and no reason to sell.
I honestly think it's easier to replace Modric than Bale. How many left sided wingers of Bales ability out there that would come to Spurs? Easier finding a replacement for Modric for the new manager. Plenty of untapped playmakers out there.
I just spoke to my Spurs mate and he was telling me something interesting about your owner (Not Levy). Your owner Joe Lewis is a BILLIONAIRE, he is the 7th richest man in Britain and has a estimated wealth of $3.8 billion and is 290th richest person of Forbes' list of billionaires.
The question remains, why hasn't he been spending? Surely if your owner is a billionaire, which Joe Lewis is, then he would be spending a bit on players?
How many of you lot knew that your club's owner is a Billionaire?
The question remains, why hasn't he been spending? Surely if your owner is a billionaire, which Joe Lewis is, then he would be spending a bit on players?
How many of you lot knew that your club's owner is a Billionaire?
I just spoke to my Spurs mate and he was telling me something interesting about your owner (Not Levy). Your owner Joe Lewis is a BILLIONAIRE, he is the 7th richest man in Britain and has a estimated wealth of $3.8 billion and is 290th richest person of Forbes' list of billionaires.
The question remains, why hasn't he been spending? Surely if your owner is a billionaire, which Joe Lewis is, then he would be spending a bit on players?
How many of you lot knew that your club's owner is a Billionaire?
You are aware that the majority of premier league teams and top teams are owned by billionaires, right?
Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester United, Manchester City, Tottenham, Newcastle, Sunderland are the only teams I could find who's owners are Billionaires.
Lets compare Joe Lewis' Net Worth to Malcom Glazers.
Joe Lewis: $3.8b
Malcom Glazer: $2.7b
The point im trying to make, Tottenham are richer than some people think. Tottenham's owner Joe Lewis' net worth is higher than Malcom Glazer. As I said, why hasn't he been spending in the transfer markets? Surely has can afford to spend £30m or £40m on a player?
Last edited:
He probably could afford to spend 30-40m on one player, but obviously we don't want to. United can afford to spend vast amounts of money whilst their Chairman has less money than ours because they have a massive stadium with an enormous revenue from fans, we have a relatively small stadium and whilst we have that, we cannot afford to pay top wages, which a 30-40m player will demand. Thus, why we tend to look at cheaper and younger talents that have high sell on values.