v0lliz - 433 V15.3.1

  • Thread starter Thread starter v0lliz
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 1K
  • Views Views 539K
I have a question. Always been curious about this. I understand the footing is important for AML/AMR, ML/MR, WBL/WBR and DL/DR but what about STCL and STCR? In tactics like this where their are 3 strikers, should we have a right footed on the right, and left footed on the left? Also, I know there are some tactics where it recommends the opposite: strong foot inside rather than outside. But since these 3 striker positions are still central strikers, like am AMC, MC, DM and DC, does the footing matter much?
 
Used original with 'attacking' at home and 'standard' away for a 1st season save with AC Milan.


Got Knudsen and Pereira in for long throws and Lucas Romero to boost the midfield. Other than that just the original squad, which imo is nowhere near best in the Serie A.


Won the league unbeaten. Conceded just 26, very happy with that.
View attachment 266259


Squad ratings
View attachment 266260


Biggest win
View attachment 266261


Most used 1st eleven
View attachment 266262
 
USMNT said:
I have a question. Always been curious about this. I understand the footing is important for AML/AMR, ML/MR, WBL/WBR and DL/DR but what about STCL and STCR? In tactics like this where their are 3 strikers, should we have a right footed on the right, and left footed on the left? Also, I know there are some tactics where it recommends the opposite: strong foot inside rather than outside. But since these 3 striker positions are still central strikers, like am AMC, MC, DM and DC, does the footing matter much?
Click to expand...

I usually prefer to have a left foot on STL and right foot on STR (or someone good with both feet). Same for the MLC and MRC and the DLC and DRC. Although I'm not sure how important it really is for the defenders.
 
USMNT said:
I have a question. Always been curious about this. I understand the footing is important for AML/AMR, ML/MR, WBL/WBR and DL/DR but what about STCL and STCR? In tactics like this where their are 3 strikers, should we have a right footed on the right, and left footed on the left? Also, I know there are some tactics where it recommends the opposite: strong foot inside rather than outside. But since these 3 striker positions are still central strikers, like am AMC, MC, DM and DC, does the footing matter much?
Click to expand...
IMO it does not matter. If your "left" striker is right footed it will be easier for him to shoot at goal when an oppertunity presents itself, however it will be harder to make a cross to a better placed teammate. Pros n cons.. I guess if your goal is to have as many goals as possible on your middle striker i would reccomend having side strikers who can deliver the ball as many times as possible. When i had Jesus Navas as a right sided striker he got loads of assists.
 
Pampu7 said:
Quanti goal hanno fatto le punte?
How many goals score the strikers?
Click to expand...

I had some injuries during the season and i tend to rotate 6 players in those 3 spots, so the goal distribution was spread out. I did get 50+ assists from my side attackers. Who scored impressive amounts of goals is the Right MC ( i think over 50 in all season) but even the left one did good too, although MC goals comes mostly from corners. Anyways scoring a total of 238 just in my league was exciting.
 
USMNT said:
I have a question. Always been curious about this. I understand the footing is important for AML/AMR, ML/MR, WBL/WBR and DL/DR but what about STCL and STCR? In tactics like this where their are 3 strikers, should we have a right footed on the right, and left footed on the left? Also, I know there are some tactics where it recommends the opposite: strong foot inside rather than outside. But since these 3 striker positions are still central strikers, like am AMC, MC, DM and DC, does the footing matter much?
Click to expand...

I got those 238 goals following none of this. I have played right footed on left, left on right, right on right and left on left and the same with central striker, dident change ANYTHING.
 
Won the Serie A with Pro Vercelli in the second season. The original v2 version is so **** good as it limits the amount of chances that my opposition is getting by a significant amount and resulted in more controlled wins.
 
dasty said:
Won the Serie A with Pro Vercelli in the second season. The original v2 version is so **** good as it limits the amount of chances that my opposition is getting by a significant amount and resulted in more controlled wins.
Click to expand...
Yes!! This is exactly what i was trying to accomplish by v2! :D
 
dasty said:
Won the Serie A with Pro Vercelli in the second season. The original v2 version is so **** good as it limits the amount of chances that my opposition is getting by a significant amount and resulted in more controlled wins.
Click to expand...
i didnt understand exatly what u mean can explain? :p
 
Tripoligate4 said:
i didnt understand exatly what u mean can explain? :p
Click to expand...
Basically BWM doing a lot more work in the midfield, CBs are no longer caught out of position because they are not in front during corners and the high line is no longer as punishing as it was in the first version of the tactic. As a result less shots on goal is being conceded, which lowers the amount of goals conceded.
 
DoubleR said:
I think I am correct in saying they have the original Volliz set pieces which work really good, some people even say better than the Leo ones. According to this test: http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/atta...t-out-tactic-testing-league_-stats-team-2.png (by Will)

The Volliz set pieces seem to work fine
Click to expand...

You're spot on, besides. MessiLeo's set pieces have nothing to do with attacking corners. That was an adjustment to defending corners and throw ins. But as you might know, throw ins does not matter as long as your throw in taker has the PPM long flat throw. Throw ins will then be set up using the attacking corner setup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top