WARLOCK

[Plutte]

4-3-1-2 Juve style

 

[alain22]

new hydra 3st

 

[Towers]

+1 for Wilson.

I'm sorry to say that we went for Aboubakar. Got him for £27 mill plus £2 mill after 20 games or so. Hopefully he and Embolo will form a lethal partnership upfront for Stoke. I do hope that Warlock will suit Aboubakar just perfect.

 

[DejanST]

Every body did same formation. Please work on 3-5-2 with wingbacks. Maybe It will be best

Guys,

I am currently on the verge of stopping tactic creation for FM16. It is possible that until November I will only create 1 more tactic, but it's precarious. Anyway I am interested in your opinion, which formation/new version you would welcome the most from the below list:

- New Hydra 3ST
- New Puskas 4-2-3-1
- 3-5-2 with wingbacks
- 4-3-1-2 Juve style
- 4-4-2 Diamond without wide midfielders
- 4-1-4-1

 

[zyndar]

Every body did same formation. Please work on 3-5-2 with wingbacks. Maybe It will be best

Who did 4-3-1-2 and Diamond?

btw as it stands:

- New Hydra 3ST +1
- New Puskas 4-2-3-1
- 3-5-2 with wingbacks +1
- 4-3-1-2 Juve style +1
- 4-4-2 Diamond without wide midfielders +1
- 4-1-4-1

 

[evo87]

I'm starting a league with Derby,
would this maybe make me achieve promotion and then carry on with it in premiership as I'm doing a internet game with a mate and there's money on it he's Middlesbrough and its first to win prem, any help appreciated

regards

 

[zyndar]

I'm starting a league with Derby,
would this maybe make me achieve promotion and then carry on with it in premiership as I'm doing a internet game with a mate and there's money on it he's Middlesbrough and its first to win prem, any help appreciated

regards

You should do well with this one.

 

[Kelevra]

3-5-2 with wingbacks

 

[zq3359590]

4-3-1-2 or 442 Diamond

 

[senac]

4-3-1-2 or 442 Diamond

second that. 442 diamond or eventually 4-3-1-2 whichever works better under current ME

 

[zyndar]

I will leave this one open until tomorrow evening.

So the question is which one of the below should be the last tactic from me for FM16:

[TABLE="class: grid, width: 354"]
[TR]
[TD]New Hydra 3ST
[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]1
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]New Puskas 4-2-3-1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]-[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]3-5-2 with wingbacks[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]4-3-1-2 Juve style[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2.5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]4-4-2 Diamond without wide midfielders[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]2.5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]4-1-4-1[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]-[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


Red numbers are indicating the number of votes. If you choose two, it means only 0.5 vote each.

 

[Galata Saray]

4-4-2!

 

[DejanST]

Enough! :O

4-4-2!

 

[Galata Saray]

Enough! :O

okey then 1-1-8. Are you happy now?

I want the see 4-4-2 tactic, what's wrong with that.

 

[bsup68]

4-4-2 Diamond without wide midfielders- just to see something different than the "normal" 4-4-2 flats

 

[DejanST]

Yes, it will be so different (6)

4-4-2 Diamond without wide midfielders- just to see something different than the "normal" 4-4-2 flats

 

[bsup68]

Yes, it will be so different (6)

Well cast your wote then

 

[zyndar]

Yes, it will be so different (6)

Actually a setup without wide mids or wingers would be very different.

 

[broeckie84]

3-5-2 with wingbacks

 

[bsup68]

Actually a setup without wide mids or wingers would be very different.

Was thinking a narrow diamond when I saw your suggestions, something like 1 DM 2MC 1 AMC was the picture in my mind