View attachment 519726View attachment 519729
I created a test data base 5 teams with 200 ca, 5 teams with 180 ca, 4 team plus my team with 160 ca and 5 teams with 140 ca. Teams are playing different formations one of each team is playing a 442, 4231, 4141, 433 and 4411. By doing this I can see against what team and formation we are struggling against.
Now after that test and I am happy, I go over to test with a normal Premier League team, like to test with Everton.
I have been using your original tactic with Spurs. Made 2 differente versions, one to control the game and retain ball (with the instructions you gave on first page, only a few tweaks more...) and been using a counter versions with the 2 CM changed to 2 DM (1 defend duty - left and 1 support duty) won 2-0 away against liverpool...
So far, so good 4 games, 4 wins. 10 goals for and 0 against.
Now we are going to visit Chelsea at Stamford Bridge.
The reason I quoted your post is to ask if the attack shape remain "that good" as original formation, because I think the AMC (playmaker) is the most important player on your original tactic because it comes deep to get the ball, link up play and fill the spaces made by one of the BWM when he goes up to support attack...