Not 100% sure, I don't have that league so I can't see the whole squad but Srna should be really good at the WB position
6-2-2-0 Counter: A Hypothesis (Work in Progress)
- Thread starter Shyftyy
- Start date
- Replies 627
- Views 117K
Not 100% sure, I don't have that league so I can't see the whole squad but Srna should be really good at the WB position
Sounds good. Please keep the updates coming.
mikedodgson
Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2010
- Messages
- 438
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
From what I can see after watching much more of the matches is that I find it harder at home.
If I concede first at home it's hard to get back in the match because:
- of the mentality of the tactic
- because the opposition have scored away from home, they operate more defensively.
Results are picking up though. Just signed Will Hughes - has the 'Dictates Tempo' PPM too.
View attachment 316312
If I concede first at home it's hard to get back in the match because:
- of the mentality of the tactic
- because the opposition have scored away from home, they operate more defensively.
Results are picking up though. Just signed Will Hughes - has the 'Dictates Tempo' PPM too.
View attachment 316312
I am turning into your biggest fan with the amount of testing you do
Yes, if your opponent has no interest in scoring what so ever it becomes a bit harder which is, like you said, the basis of the tactic. I have seen comebacks though since the standard mentality will allow your possession to go up a bit.
P
p3d0l0v3
Guest
Hi!!! I updated a bit your tactic since i hate playing without strikers!!! If it was for me I would put 11 strikers on the field (joking... since this wouldn't be possible) The team is playing great!!! Have a look!!!
View attachment 316314
View attachment 316315
View attachment 316316
View attachment 316317
View attachment 316314
View attachment 316315
View attachment 316316
View attachment 316317
Looking very good, congratulations!
Perhaps we can make a home and away tactic like this. I am going to keep testing my own version though
P
p3d0l0v3
Guest
You are the father!!! I'm just the grown up taking the positives from the father's advice!!! I set the crossing location of the LB, RB, WBL and WBR to TARGET MAN and the passing to both flanks in order to deliver many crosses to the target man!!! The rest is your tactic and defensively it looks really strong!!!
As you've said the opposition are starting to get mad with their lack of CCC...)))) Great defensive Shyftyy!!!
I set the crossing location of the LB, RB, WBL and WBR to TARGET MAN and the passing to both flanks in order to deliver many crosses to the target man!!! The rest is your tactic and defensively it looks really strong!!!As you've said the opposition are starting to get mad with their lack of CCC...
)))) Great defensive Shyftyy!!!You set target man run onto. etc?
mikedodgson
Member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2010
- Messages
- 438
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Can you put up a screen of your Training?
Just want to make sure it's the same!
Just want to make sure it's the same!
i going to use both if need a goal then i'll use striker 1The one with the strikers or the original one?
It's weird to me that this original tactic, can work so well with Barca and Bristol, but doesn't work with other teams..
If you're up for it Shyftyy, and if it is possible, maybe tweak it for use of all teams?
That's what I am looking into right now. I need to find out what causes the differences. The original is a Work in Progress after all
No, I am not but I create a quick account if you want?
no it dunt matter