iNickStuff what would you say is the best tactic for a top team that gives the best results in every area of the pitch?
Im asking this because im currently using a 4-2-3-1 but it doesn't seem to gel that much together during the match though. My players don't really create much CCC but i still managed to score 90 goals in the league last season. My defence looking shaky when under pressure as well and I often had to rely on the goalkeeper. I hate when teams play balls in behind my back four.
Another problem that i have is Lavezzi doesn't really run onto balls. He sometimes stands stagnant when other players have an opportunity to play a through ball. Neymar and Robben don't really score as much as i would like them to.
Sandro and Vidal are probably my biggest under achievers because theyre great players but Sandro got an average rating of 7.11 and Vidal a flat 7.
Ill tell you my team but I cant put a screenine up because im away from home.
Gk - Emiliano Viviano
Rb - Marcelo(Regen) Hes like Danie Alves minues the dribbling skills. Role - Full back - Attack
Cb - Phil Jones. Role - Central defender - Defend
Cb - Johan Djourou. Role - Central defender - Defend
Lb - Jose Enrique. Role - Full back - Attack
Cm - Sandro. Role - Ball winning mid - Defend
Cm - Vidal. Role - Ball winning mid - support
Rw - Robben. Role - Inside forward - Attack
Cam - Campora(Regen, similar to Messi). Role - Attacking Midfielder - Attack
Lw - Neymar. Inside forward - Attack
St - Lavezzi(Its on LFC's update so his finishing and composure is 16). Advanced forward.
Philosophy - Fluid
Strategy - Attack
Passing- Short
Creative freedom - Expressive
Tackling - Cautious
Marking - Zonal
Crosses - Drill
Roam from position
I basically need help to make my players perform better and look more together as a team. I want more goals with less conceded(conceded 20 last season). Im not sure how to do this because ive switched between control and attacking strategies, more expressive and default freedom etc. with out the results im looking for. Would direct passing make any difference and also would stand off pressing help with defensive frailties?
Thank you.
Fracpen was correct, and you should have used the thread he linked, but never mind. It's here now so I might as well answer it.
Maybe you should change the roles of your full backs, as putting them on Attack duty will expose your defence on the majority of occassions if your attack is not working out and losing possession quickly. Full Back in Automatic does just as fine as Full Back on Automatic. Less adventurous, yes, but it stops the defence being exposed down the wings. Especially when playing on wide or long pitches which encourage direct passing and quicker attacking.
I would also suggest making one of your defender a Limited Defender and the other to have the duty of Cover. Or even just the 'Stopper - Cover' system. Especially with a high line it could benefit, but I would look at the two defenders' mental stats (Concentration, Anticipation, Decisions, Determination, Work Rate, Teamwork - not all of them but Concentration, Anticipation and Decisions are the three most important).
If the midfield or attack of the opposition can be closed down by one of the central defenders, due to high Aggression and Bravery, then possibly the attacks would be less dangerous and nullified much quicker. Thus, high pressing, better attacking and a stronger defence.
I would also like to point out that playing Sandro as a Deep-Lying Playmaker on Support duty would be a good idea. As much as he is a good tackler and can win the ball, I would suggest him to have a more freelance role where he can still control the midfield, but be the 'creator' of the midfield pairing, next to a destroyer in Arturo Vidal. I don't know what Campora's attributes and PPM's are, but maybe playing him as an Inside Forward on Support would help, as he would be drifting in and outside of the centre and to the flanks to get the ball into the box to players like Robben, Sandro, Lavezzi and Neymar.
Suggested roles for Arjen Robben and Ezequiel Lavezzi would be Advanced Playmaker on Attack and Poacher. As for the direct passing, it differs. The situations from the matches you play may dictate that direct passing would be dangerous. For example:
Your team may have high Passing, but your team's passes are more likely to be intercepted and retrieved by the opposition who may be on a similar level to yours or even superior. The counter-attacks would be much greater and frequent.
Or even just playing any team. The pitch would often determine whether or not it would be suitable. Long pitches that promote direct passing would be good, but also narrow pitches, as it can go through the centre and in to Lavezzi. You can try it, but also consider the pitch size, weather and the opposition's abilities. Would use it in a varied manner.
---------- Post added at 12:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 AM ----------
You don't need to quote the whole post, it takes too much space. Also I would recommend to use language that everyone understands. Some users and lurkers don't speak English as their native language.
And to your question, there isn't one answer. That article gave you the basic things you need to consider when making a possession based tactic, rest is in your own hands. Good way to play your midfield is to use destroyer-passer-creator combo, where one of the midfielders, the destroyer, wins the ball to your team and plays simple passes to players near him, usually ballwinning midfielder on defend or defensive midfielder on defend. Passer is a deep lying playmaker style of player, drops deep to get the ball and tries to play it forward, also balancing your game, sometimes passing simple passes backwards to slow down a bit. Deep lying playmaker on support or defend is good choise. Last, the creator, looks to break the defensive line with through balls or runs from deep. Advanced playmaker or any of the roles of AMC should be suitable. You should just mix up a bit and see what works.
Indeed. Thank you for helping him out.
ahh my bad..i was in a hurry to make the previous post.......so had some typical keyboard error...any way thnx for da suggestion
No worries. Just remember to refer to the article by it's title, rather than quoting it next time.