Jeffrey007
Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2016
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Contain doesn't seem to work in away games, dominate but still concede
ANNIHILATOR!
- Thread starter TotalFootballFan9
- Start date
- Replies 845
- Views 472K
"Contain"? what do you mean?
i guess he mean the waste time tactic, i use it but only vs strong team and only in the 75 min
I also use it only when I need to hold the lead at last minutes, I don’t think it’s a good idea to use Waste Time tactic for the entire match.
agree mate,i also dont think its good to use it for the entire match
rencamboot
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2010
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
Mark the mc
Jeffrey007
Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2016
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
i mean the team mentality
TotalFootballFan9
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 4,113
- Reaction score
- 201
- Points
- 63
******
TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V3
CHANGES:
- tweaked the dribbling settings of ML/MR positions
IMPORTANT THE FOOT REQUIREMENTS FOR ML/MR POSITIONS HAS CHANGED:
ML SHOULD BE RIGHT FOOTED
MR SHOULD BE LEFT FOOTED OR HE SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST "FAIRLY STRONG" RATING FOR THE LEFT FOOT
The filters, attributes, PPMs and training have been updated (there are changes for ML/MR positions)
TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V3
CHANGES:
- tweaked the dribbling settings of ML/MR positions
IMPORTANT THE FOOT REQUIREMENTS FOR ML/MR POSITIONS HAS CHANGED:
ML SHOULD BE RIGHT FOOTED
MR SHOULD BE LEFT FOOTED OR HE SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST "FAIRLY STRONG" RATING FOR THE LEFT FOOT
The filters, attributes, PPMs and training have been updated (there are changes for ML/MR positions)
Last edited:
Igor Pinto
Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2009
- Messages
- 41
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Somebody can share again ANNIHILATOR V1? Thank You
M
mrarrwstos4
Guest
thanks a lot m8
by the way , have you found any better corner set up? the amount of goals /chances by corner is kinda low :/ thanks for this nice tactic
I really prefer the more easy-to-find footedness so I'll definitely be sticking to V2. Mainly because I am handicapping myself by playing with a DoF and it is impossible to instruct them to find IF type players at the MR and ML positions.
TotalFootballFan9
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 4,113
- Reaction score
- 201
- Points
- 63
of course, only left footed on MR position and only right footed on ML position will work
Is this tactic any different from V1? It seems to just reverse the V2 changes?
Could you explain the change of v1 to v2 and then the reverse closer to v1?
Was v2 a mistake?
TotalFootballFan9
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 4,113
- Reaction score
- 201
- Points
- 63
Yes, in V3 the dribbling settings of ML/MR positions are different than in V1
As I said V3 isn't "reverse" to V1 and V2 wasn't mistake, it's simple that V3 is better than V2 and V1
Last edited:
Yes, in V3 the dribbling settings of ML/MR are different than in V1
As I said V3 isn't "reverse" to V1 and V2 wasn't mistake, it's simple that V3 is better than V2 and V1
What made you re test with inverted wingers?
TotalFootballFan9
Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 4,113
- Reaction score
- 201
- Points
- 63
"inverted wingers" isn't the change what makes V3 better than V1 and V2 and I'd say the new dribbling settings of ML/MR positions are more important, also, please notice that now for V3 you need slightly different type of players for ML/MR positions.
The reason behind this change is simple as always, it'll make the attack to be more efficient
bump
"inverted wingers" isn't the change what makes V3 better than V1 and V2 and I'd say the new dribbling settings of ML/MR positions are more important, also, please notice that now for V3 you need slightly different type of players for ML/MR positions.
The reason behind this change is simple as always, it'll make the attack to be more efficient
bump
I did notice, its more Coutinho less Sterling.
Is a right footed MR going to do better with v2 or v3? If may have to make a slow transition between them.