reel your kneck in,
You said Wilshire is a better play them Lampard, which is clearly wrong. Anyone can agree with that. You want to know why Lampard hasnt produed his club form for England, because he is played out of position, Sven insisted on him playing in a 2 man midfield with Gerrard, where lampard ended up defending and holidng position, then we had Maclaren who played him as a holdng midfielder, in god knows how many formations he tried. remember the 3-5-2 he tried.... now we have capello, who doesnt seem to favour lampard in the advance position he likes in the world cup. now he is looking like another deeper laying player in a 4-2-3-1 type formation. Frank lampard is the kinda player we should be basing our team around, as on club form he is one of ourmost effective players. You ee England have this theory of wasting talents, Scholes comes to mind straight away, i feel in another national team Frank would a real great of England national team, just like Scholes should of been.
You said Wilshire is better then Lampard. No that Wilshire would be a better pick for England.. they are completely different things.... To try and say some 19 year old kid, in his first full season for arsenal is a better play, then someone who has scored more then 100 goals from midfield for his club in just league football.
Gareth barry is ****.