Coalition launches Libya attacks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joel`
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 406
  • Views Views 22K
Infract me if you want, but I need to say this.

Serbs in Kosovo
5 % now, before NATO aggression 80 %
Albanians in Kosovo
over 90 % now, before 15 %
You have no clue about this Mike, dont act otherwise.

About Libya, Gaddafi needs to go down, but his own people needs to take him down, not ******* NATO.
dont be so childish.. lol did you forget that people left becuase of the massacres. if you are going to call people clueless do proper research first. last warning stay on topic

And nato arent taking him down use your eyes. they could have blown him up from the start, but they havent. they are limiting his position to attack civilians and the rebels. the rest will be done by the people

---------- Post added at 10:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------

Libyan rebels recapture Ajdabiya
Anti-government fighters, backed by allied air strikes, push Muammar Gaddafi's forces out of strategic eastern town

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/26/libyan-rebels-recapture-ajdabiya

Libyan rebels backed by allied air strikes have recaptured the strategic eastern town of Ajdabiya, pushing out Muammar Gaddafi's forces.

Anti-government fighters danced on tanks, waved flags and fired in the air next to buildings riddled with bulletholes after an all-night battle that suggested the tide was turning against Gaddafi's forces in the east.

A Reuters correspondent saw half a dozen wrecked tanks near the eastern entrance to the town and the ground strewn with empty shell casings. There were also signs of heavy fighting at the western gate, the last part of the town taken from government troops.

"Everything was destroyed last night by our forces," said rebel fighter Sarhag Agouri. Witnesses and fighters said the whole town was in rebel hands by late morning.

Capturing Ajdabiya is a big morale boost for the rebels after two weeks spent on the back foot.

Gaddafi's better-armed forces halted an early rebel advance near the major oil export terminal of Ras Lanuf and pushed them back to their stronghold of Benghazi until western powers struck Gaddafi's positions from the sea and air.

Air strikes on Ajdabiya on Friday afternoon seem to have been decisive. The African Union (AU) said it was planning to facilitate talks to help end the war, but Nato said its operation could last three months, and France said the conflict would not end soon.

In Washington, a US military spokeswoman said the coalition fired 16 Tomahawk cruise missiles and flew 153 air sorties in the past 24 hours, attacking Gaddafi's artillery, mechanised forces and command and control infrastructure.

Western governments hope the raids, launched a week ago with the aim of protecting civilians, will shift the balance of power in favour of the Arab world's most violent popular revolt.

In Tripoli, explosions were heard early on Saturday, signalling possible new strikes by warplanes or missiles.

Libyan state television was broadcasting occasional news reports of western air strikes. Mostly it showed footage – some of it grainy images years old – of cheering crowds waving green flags and carrying portraits of Gaddafi.

Neither he nor his sons have been shown on state television since the Libyan leader made a speech from his Tripoli compound on Wednesday.

State TV said the "brother leader" had promoted all members of his armed forces and police "for their heroic and courageous fight against the crusader, colonialist assault".

The US said Gaddafi's ability to command and sustain his forces was diminishing.

Officials and rebels said aid organisations were able to deliver some supplies to the western city of Misrata but were concerned because of government snipers in the city centre.

Gaddafi's forces shelled an area on the outskirts of the city, killing six people including three children, a rebel said.

Misrata has experienced some of the heaviest fighting between rebels and government forces since an uprising began on 16 February.

At AU headquarters in Addis Ababa, the commission chairman, Jean Ping, said the organisation was planning to facilitate peace talks in a process that should end with democratic elections.

It was the first statement by the AU, which had opposed any form of foreign intervention in the Libya crisis, since the UN security council imposed a no-fly zone last week and air strikes began on Libyan military targets.

But in Brussels, a Nato official said planning for its operation assumed a mission lasting 90 days, although this could be extended or shortened as required. France said the mission could go on for weeks.
 
Last edited:
NATO aren't taking him down. They're assisting. How do you expect his own people to take him down, when Gaddafi has the might of the whole army and elite soldiers, and the opposition have nothing but untrained rebels with old guns?

There are 6 million people in Libya. They can take him down with forks if they want.
 
There are 6 million people in Libya. They can take him down with forks if they want.
no they cant, people vs tanks and artillery and warplanes, the army wins, and he has tens of thousands of well armed troop and thousands more mercenaries. like i said if you have been following you would know that they would need more help
 
There are 6 million people in Libya. They can take him down with forks if they want.

Naivety at its best. As Mike said, Gaddafi could be long gone by now if NATO wanted it. They're assisting in letting the Libyan's take it back and make their own decisions. You obviously don't understand a thing that's going on, and just gone in a massive rage the moment you heard of military action.
 
dont be so childish. if you are going to start insults i will simply ban you. lol did you forget that people left becuase of the massacres. if you are going to call people clueless do proper research first. last warning stay on topic

And nato arent taking him down use your eyes. they could have blown him up from the start, but they havent. they are limiting his position to attack civilians and the rebels. the rest will be done by the people

NATO didnt have green light for that. Its just matter of time when they going to blow him.
 
NATO didnt have green light for that. Its just matter of time when they going to blow him.
if they wanted the green light they could have got it, they have no intention of blowing him up, not unless he does something mental like go for his mustard gas
 
Naivety at its best. As Mike said, Gaddafi could be long gone by now if NATO wanted it. They're assisting in letting the Libyan's take it back and make their own decisions. You obviously don't understand a thing that's going on, and just gone in a massive rage the moment you heard of military action.

Maybe im tierd of this neo colonialism ?
 
Don't be fooled Mike and Joel, forks are deceptively effective vs armored personell carriers.

Spoons on the other hand are completely worthless
 
Maybe im tierd of this neo colonialism ?
lol now you have just proved you have no idea what's going on. all this started becuase a man burnt himself to death in protest in tunisia. This wave of unrest has travelled across the arab world

---------- Post added at 10:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:36 PM ----------

6 000 000 > 2 000
wrong, just wrong

for a start not all 6 million can fight has some are gadaffi supporters, some are children, some a re too old and some are just too scared. dont be so simplistic
 
Has there been any stories as to how the Rebels got all their equipment? Like funding from Army x etc.

Would like to read something on it, since they're obviously getting their equipment from someone.
 
Has there been any stories as to how the Rebels got all their equipment? Like funding from Army x etc.

Would like to read something on it, since they're obviously getting their equipment from someone.
a lot of it is stolen from army depots, and also from soldiers who have defected, also lybia's borders are porous, any arms dealer worth his/her salt will be there
 
Has there been any stories as to how the Rebels got all their equipment? Like funding from Army x etc.

Would like to read something on it, since they're obviously getting their equipment from someone.

A good deal comes from rebels confiscating it from armories or from army units who have aligned themselves with the rebels.
 
6 000 000 / 2 000 = 3 000 times more rebels than Gaddafi's men. Screw logic

No matter how many people you have on your side, run at a gun unarmored and unarmed. without a gun of your own, your going to have to kill them at close quarters.
Ive got a shotgun, Ill meet you somewhere and we can try it out if you want!
and also not all of the population are capable of fighting, to young/old, or ill, or even some still support gaddafi! Your ignorance is incredible, how you ever considered emigrating to America, you'd be worshiped as a god out there
 
6 000 000 / 2 000 = 3 000 times more rebels than Gaddafi's men. Screw logic

These mathematical skills you are showing are phenomenal. Unfortunately, they are wrong. Not all of Libya's population are fighting. A fraction of them are able to fight, and a fraction of that are willing. Also, you should have co-efficients for each number to represent the better equipped and skilled army personnel compared to the under-equipped and poorly skilled rebels.

Logic.
 
These mathematical skills you are showing are phenomenal. Unfortunately, they are wrong. Not all of Libya's population are fighting. A fraction of them are able to fight, and a fraction of that are willing. Also, you should have co-efficients for each number to represent the better equipped and skilled army personnel compared to the under-equipped and poorly skilled rebels.

Logic.

6 000 000/ 2 000 x2 ( spoons and forks)= 6 000 times more people ? If you can act smart, so can I
 
6 000 000/ 2 000 x2 ( spoons and forks)= 6 000 times more people ? If you can act smart, so can I

Indeed. Lets forget these **** tomahawk missiles. Forks are the way forward!!
 
Back
Top