NATO was supposed to be a civillian protector, it's become a rebel bomb squad.
Libya is going to collapse as a nation, like what happened to Iraq following the invasion. Will be interestingto see how political this is and if NATO continue to help out nations in similar circumstances, will they help the smaller Bahrain? I don't think so. They won't inervene with the Saudi's either because of the business links.
Not saying I don't want Gadaffi's reign taken down, but bombing the cities and ruining the towns for the civillians who will have to take partin the rebuilding.
Difficult times.
Don't really see why people are happy. Sure Gaddafi is going, yes, he was a brutal and murderous dictator, yes, he deserves to be hung by the balls..
But what's going to happen once this fine country inevitably slips into total ******* anarchy? The Russians and us decide to come knocking? It's all part of a bigger picture...
What do you want, Gaddafi in charge or Gaddafi not in charge? Those were the only two outcomes.
That's not the point though. My point is, who's going to be in charge after Mad Dog goes. There will be power struggles, corruption, total ******* anarchy, and it will plunge the country into deeper civil war. Do we know who's part of the rebels? Can they be trusted? For all we know, they can install someone from Al-Qaeda into power.
That's not the point though. My point is, who's going to be in charge after Mad Dog goes. There will be power struggles, corruption, total ******* anarchy, and it will plunge the country into deeper civil war. Do we know who's part of the rebels? Can they be trusted? For all we know, they can install someone from Al-Qaeda into power.
Bombing very specific targets in town. They still wont hit the compound proper, only around it. They hit certain targets only .They have been frequently criticised by rebels for not bombing enough. Only intervened militarily because arab league countries actually asked. Saudi Arabia is nothing like Lybia, unless you mean Syria, but that wont be because of business.
Not sure how can have a go at Nato for the state of the cites. Most of the destruction was done by Gaddafi's forces and then rebels
There'll always be the side effects to bombing, it's a risky practice, one I don' agree with in this instance. Whether or not th Rebels have complained about a lack of is another matter, this is not what NATO is there to do. I didn't mean Saudi in the sense that it had a similar circumstace, buttheir ruling is terrible, and was talking about if they would do anything on the matter. there are many othr examples that they will not get into, simply because ofpolitics even though it is supposedto be a civillian protecting group, as you said Syria.
Being reported on Sky News, that Libyan Transistional Goverment Forces, have reportedly wounded Gadaffi in both legs and captured near Sirte while trying to flee the city.
Good, hope it ******* hurts
Other reports now saying Gaddafi has died from his injuries.
Until I get a postcard saying he's dead, I won't believe it.
that makes no sense whatsoever.