My main problem with organised religion is its hereditary nature
Lets say 2 parents are Christian, in all likelihood they will pass on their faith to their newly born child. But this is what I have a problem with. How can something be a true belief if the person isn't given a choice? I am not saying this child will have less faith than a convert; but just that they never got to pick what the believed, it was forced upon them. I'm sure that if my parents were Muslim, I would have been brought up a Muslin and believe in the Qur'an- but they weren't and I don't. This just subverts the whole notion of faith to me, because it's just something passed on through a family.
I would compare it to politics. Many people are politically influenced by their family. For example my grandfather was a working class miner, so naturally he voted Labour, and my dad was influenced by this and voted Labour too, and has done so ever since. He did not view all the parties policies and moral line and then make an informed decision, but just followed what his parents did. Religion is very much the same; but with religion I'd say the chances of a child brought up in a faith converting is far less than that of a child having different political beliefs than their parents.
Anywho, that's what I think. Personally I'm an atheist, but I think having faith in something must be a very comforting thing and is in fact something i'm jealous of.
you can envy faith because ignorance is bliss when it comes to it, me too