Scouseinthehouse
Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2015
- Messages
- 21,543
- Reaction score
- 4,725
- Points
- 113
Did someone mention they couldn't understand Walker playing ahead of Clyne? .....
View attachment 143295
View attachment 143295
Did someone mention they couldn't understand Walker playing ahead of Clyne? .....
View attachment 1060980
Walker the better of the two so far.
I tried to figure out what kind of tactic Roy is using. The players just seem to be on the pitch, get ball forward and somehow maybe get a goal.
Roy uses tactics? :O
Did someone mention they couldn't understand Walker playing ahead of Clyne? .....
View attachment 1060980
You always advocate that stats are misleading when someone brings it up, those stats have been very carefully selected. .....
Most ALL stats are carefully selected to suit aren't they? That's why they're pretty much superfluous and can be manipulated to suit. They were off a general site FWIW and not a particular team biased one. Clyne was certainly England's best player yesterday. As Walker was the Russian game for me. (Never saw the Wales game.).
Overall point still stands that there wasn't a more consistent FB last year than Clyne through 52 games. This assertion here that Walker's 'by far and away England's best RB' I just can't get down with having watched Clyne all last season. There's only the Utd game that jumps out as a bad one he had. (Sure there's one or two others I'm forgetting. But the fact only one instantly jumps out tells you a lot about how consistent his performances were.).
That said, again, I get the club connection and I'm more than happy for Walker to play the rest of this tournament ahead of him.
.....
Also how do you know Walker was less consistent than Clye did you watch every Spurs game too? I am being facetious but I amsure you get the point
Without getting into a debate on the worth, or not, of most stats in the modern game; I'll take the 52 games over 35 as a better indication of consistency.
I'm not dismissing/ dissing Walker at all. I just know the season Nathaniel had last year and for it to be said on here that the 'Spurs man is by far and away England's best RB I just can't agree with.
Really that's how the Rationale you are using? How can I even argue with that kind of logic........
Scouse, you're L'pool fan, by default you're wrong.
Yet you can pick arbitrary figures that 'you're betting on' being correct to make a point?
No need to be an *** man because we don't agree. WAY too many around here have that moniker patented already.