Did someone mention they couldn't understand Walker playing ahead of Clyne? .....
View attachment 1060980
The he stats are overblown by the fact that many of the chances we created last night were not good
Did someone mention they couldn't understand Walker playing ahead of Clyne? .....
View attachment 1060980
Walker the better of the two so far.
I tried to figure out what kind of tactic Roy is using. The players just seem to be on the pitch, get ball forward and somehow maybe get a goal.
Roy uses tactics? :O
Did someone mention they couldn't understand Walker playing ahead of Clyne? .....
View attachment 1060980
You always advocate that stats are misleading when someone brings it up, those stats have been very carefully selected. .....
Most ALL stats are carefully selected to suit aren't they? That's why they're pretty much superfluous and can be manipulated to suit. They were off a general site FWIW and not a particular team biased one. Clyne was certainly England's best player yesterday. As Walker was the Russian game for me. (Never saw the Wales game.).
Overall point still stands that there wasn't a more consistent FB last year than Clyne through 52 games. This assertion here that Walker's 'by far and away England's best RB' I just can't get down with having watched Clyne all last season. There's only the Utd game that jumps out as a bad one he had. (Sure there's one or two others I'm forgetting. But the fact only one instantly jumps out tells you a lot about how consistent his performances were.).
That said, again, I get the club connection and I'm more than happy for Walker to play the rest of this tournament ahead of him.
.....
Also how do you know Walker was less consistent than Clye did you watch every Spurs game too? I am being facetious but I amsure you get the point
Without getting into a debate on the worth, or not, of most stats in the modern game; I'll take the 52 games over 35 as a better indication of consistency.
I'm not dismissing/ dissing Walker at all. I just know the season Nathaniel had last year and for it to be said on here that the 'Spurs man is by far and away England's best RB I just can't agree with.
Really that's how the Rationale you are using? How can I even argue with that kind of logic........
Scouse, you're L'pool fan, by default you're wrong.
Yet you can pick arbitrary figures that 'you're betting on' being correct to make a point?
No need to be an *** man because we don't agree. WAY too many around here have that moniker patented already.
Really?
First off I am not being an *** if I was you would know.
Secondly, I am not picking arbitary monikers that I am betting on being correct to make point. I watched Spurs alot becuase they are a good team to watch and Walker was excellent. I also use stats to back up my point, I don't see how Clyne is more consistent by virtue of playing more games, that is ridiculous.
Yes we don't agree and barring Pool fans I think everyone would want to see Walker in the team ahead of Clyne. The difference I am tryong to add substance to my point of view and not just saying I watched all his games ergo he was more consistent.
Fucksake, you try and have some proper debate and people just can't do it. Think what you want because frankly I cba
I have to agree with epic terrorist here. Scouse posted a graphic which quite obviously selectively presented stats to show that Clyne was the better player. Epic terrorist disproved that quite thoroughly imo by digging deeper and showing the other side of the coin. Now I am not statiscal expert who knows how to give all these statistics the proper contextual treatment they deserve and break this deadlock but I find that it is certainlys stretch to say that Clyne is better than Walker at this point.
Furthermore Scouse, you may have watched every LFC game and think Clyne is better and while I respect your opinion, did you watch every Spurs game as well? A team that incidentally nearly won the title with Walker playing nearly every game while Liverpool finished 8th. If not, how can you make a conclusive judgement on who is the better player when you only watch one player regularly who also happens to be from the team you support colouring you invariably with a little bias. Also while ability of player matters, it may simply be that Walker fits better into what Hodgson is trying to achieve with his tactics or maybe he has better chemistry with his defensive partners. There are so many factors that go into selecting a player instead of just ability alone.