Prey tell what I'm skipping over? You say there's no English manager better than foreign options. I say what have you got to lose when you've had no success going down that road? You don't agree that the English National team manager should be English. My views on which I've made quite clear since you went out of the Euro's and you've answered. Yet you now want them answering again? What else would you like answered? And do I need to back up with 'facts?' Just in case you go off on another rant at some point in the future with absolutely no substance you can reference back to when repeatedly asked?
Or shall we just agree that we disagree on this?
And as I already told you, the foreign managers that failed such as Capello did not fail because of their nationality per se. What habe we got to lose by appointing an inexperienced young manager like Howe? We become more of a joke than we already are. What have we got to gain if we appoint an experienced foreign manager like Mancini or Pelligerini? We can atleast start punching our weight in international tournaments and they have greater chance of succeeding and lesser chance of failing than Howe or whichever other English manager you care to name.
Yes I do not agree with your views because they seem arbitrary. You are more than happy to have foreign players and manager at Liverpool and even call a German who has been there for a few months the new Shankly. Therefore, I see no reason why you should have an issue with England having a foreign manager as long as he understands and appreciates English football and the culture that goes along with it. A point which you did skip over since you asked me to pray tell.
Keep the snarkiness away Scouse. I made one mistake in misquoting you and left it when I realized. No need to hang it over the head. A debate in which you incidentally had no response to my counter arguments. So if you want to really play the 'facts' game, I think you are the one who uses and ignores them at your convenience.
Last edited: