bcfc1
Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2013
- Messages
- 1,049
- Reaction score
- 248
- Points
- 63
If you want me to explain why i thought Liverpool was the better option
Liverpool
2nd most successful PL club
European football
More likely to play 1st team football at a young age (than at Chelsea or City)
Finished 2nd last season
Man Utd
Most successful PL club
No European football
Likely to play youngsters (more than city or Chelsea)
Finished 7th or something last season (too tired to remember)
I'm too tired to remember all factors but all four/five clubs had positive factors about them, I thought Liverpool and United would be most likely options and then based my judgement on those factors and see what was a more likely move
These are good factors to take into consideration and I might be a little biased as I am Man Utd Chairman but I think you missed out on a factor that could have sent him to Man Utd. Van Gaal plays 3 CB's and only had Evans Smalling and Jones while Rodgers plays 2 CB's and had Agger Toure and Lovren, I think the chairman sold Skrtel to someone but I cant definitely remember. This means that Balanta will probably get more game time at Man Utd than Liverpool. I think this could be another factor you use to decide for later transfers.