fucksbunny
Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2011
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Don't forget RomianProbably the hardest worker here
![]()
How can I forget him

Don't forget RomianProbably the hardest worker here
![]()
Just a quick update everyone....testing has pretty much come to a complete stand still. Hence why nothing really has been tested in the last few days. The results we get from our tests are so random and too unreliable for our liking on this current version of the game.
You visit the threads of some of these great tactic creators and you see some pretty amazing results. You then try to replicate on this test and you become boggled on how you could achieve such a different result. Almost leaves you gutted. It's the perfect time to take a break.
Patch 14.3 will include a lot of fixes so it will keep tactic creators busy. We have some ideas in store for testing in patch 14.3. Including position based attributes which will get us closer to resembling a realistic personal game. I will say this though, if they don't fix the randomness issue then this thread is really all for nothing.
Great work though Mantorrass, the effort you put in to keep us FM fans enlightened is superb, Cheers.
Any ideas when 14.3 will be out???
The attribute changes in the next version of the database will help improve the results. However, I wouldn't expect the randomness of the results to improve with this method of testing though. This years FM2014 is A LOT better than previous years because the opposition AI manager adapts their strategy dynamically during the game. You can't expect to just plug and play a tactic now and have it win everything, to succeed you need to analyse the opponents shape and weaknesses and exploit them. Scoring the opening goal changes everything as the opponent then has to attack you leaving more holes in their defence etc. So luck plays an important part of the result too, just like in real football...
The testing is still useful though at pointing the way to good tactics, so please keep it up.
Why does the "fulcrum-rainmaker" have 91 pts in the OP screenshot and then 69pts in the OP table? Did you change the tests versions?
You tried version 2 yet? It's ridiculous. Best tactic I've used. It's over on the community.sigames.com forum.![]()
Last year it came out on February 28 so would expect around the same time frame this year.
Thanks for the vote of confidence (H)
Here's the problem with the Randomness issue. If i'm testing the same tactic vs the exact same teams, coaches, formations and players two test season's in a row there's NO WAY I should finish with 90pts one test season and 50pts the other test season period! I could see maybe a 20 pts swing at the max and blame in on bad luck but 40pts!!??? No way!!!
You tried version 2 yet? It's ridiculous. Best tactic I've used. It's over on the community.sigames.com forum.![]()
Depends what you've used until now
5th place with norwich first season, no transfers, mighty impressive I must say, but I've done better, not on this patch I admit, but the 14.1.4 with 3-4-2-1-0.tac
Thing is, the latest patch sucks, that's why i reverted back to 14.1.4 for the second time.
Depends what you've used until now
5th place with norwich first season, no transfers, mighty impressive I must say, but I've done better, not on this patch I admit, but the 14.1.4 with 3-4-2-1-0.tac
Thing is, the latest patch sucks, that's why i reverted back to 14.1.4 for the second time.
I apologise if this has been asked a lot, but mantorras, in your experience testing all of these tactics, which is the most reliable plug and play "no messing around" tactic out of all of those you've tested? Especially for weaker members of a division and lower league teams?