1. I have never seen Walcott take a decent long shot in my life, maybe I'm missing out a few goals/shots/attempts? Either way, he's not as good as Nani in that aspect.
2. It's improving yes, but so is Nani's, and Nani's was better before the improvement in both of them, and still is.
3. Walcott has got **** technique compared to Nani, don't be so blinded.
4. Yes he has the fundamental aspects to become a good player but that means in the future. Not now, we are talking about the present Nick, not in 2/3/4, maybe even 5 years time.
5. Lol don't go all E-Warrior on me and say 'what are you going to do about it?'. This is a forum, if you have an opinion and you express be prepared to get challenged on it, and don't react like a baby.
Au Revoir.
I am/have expressed an opinion, and it has been ripped to shreads it seems. At least there's someone with me on this. I was saying, IT'S MY OPINION, and have I aired it? Yes, I think I have? I am listening to all of this, and listening. Reacting like a baby :O. Nope, I don't think so?
Anyway, I'm very tired, and I have a Mandarin test tomorrow, and I can't be bothered to debate further with my opinion, which is that - Walcott, on his day is better than Nani, and that Nani has no right to go ans say he's one of the world's best.
Au revoir, bonne nuit
