Rooney should of been sent off yesterday aswell. 1st challenge for kicking out at a Sunderland player which could of easily been a red by itself. The 2nd for telling the ref to give Richardson a second yellow. Sportsmanship? Thats discusting.
yeah their is and fletcher comes down on the passionate side.
he was booked against arsenal if i'm not mistaken.
actaully my bad. he wasn't.i could have swore he was:Owas he my fault if he was![]()
Nah don't think he was thats why their was uproar about it he made a load of fouls some of them horribleactaully my bad. he wasn't.i could have swore he was:O
i like you JDY but disgusting.
hardly.
We definitely didnt deserve to win, that is the worst iv seen us play in absolutely ages, Sunderland played well in the first half and were defending extremely well and must of been gutted as i thought they maybe deserved to get the 3 points, but im happy we got the late goal.
so i guess your'e not a real fan then as you see everything as you want.scott take note this is a real fan who sees the game as its is!! not just as he wants!
fletcher is a hatchet man your bang on , he is trying to be the next roy keane and be a hard man got to be the dirtyist player this season so far.imoYeah was great Andy Reid is a little genius, although the hatchet man Fletcher tried to break his legs with an horrendous late challenge
so i guess your'e not a real fan then as you never see everything as you want.
@JDY,
yeah i know gutted.:O. i've got it now but i'm rubbish.. hopefully i'll improve.
i admit we were lucky but i take offence to people calling fletcher a hatchet man and find it annoying you of all people are having a go at someone for being biased. if you really want me to give examples of your bias i will.
you make no sense. you tell me to take a leaf out of andi and keith's book and admit we were lucky yet in the post you quoted i admitted we were lucky. i didn't mention arsenal.go ahead !if you can`t take other peoples opions on your players faults or then why get involved? fltcher is a hatchet man simples as for united yes your right they were lucky.
you need to take a leaf out of keiths and andi`s book mate they admit that they were lucky and there happy with a point i don`t get why you take these comments so personally!
don`t forget this is a manu v sunderland thread and not a thread about manu and arsenal!
you make no sense. you tell me to take a leaf out of andi and keith's book and admit we were lucky yet in the post you quoted i admitted we were lucky. i didn't mention arsenal.
your bias:
You still insist you were conned by the referee against us.
you claimed rooney dived against you when almunia blatantly made contact.
you claimed the ref conned city with the extra time when it turned out he was right.
you seem to think there is a pro united conspiracy with all refs.
you claimed richardson shouldn't have been sent off when he was obviously time wasting.
there are many others i can't quite remember.
fletcher is not a hatchet man. i'm not saying he is an angel but he doesn't start a match with the intention of kicking the other players off the pitch.
You're right you know. It was more time than was supposed to be allocated. MotD checked it by going through the entire second half, taking every stoppage into account. Owen scored 1 second after full time should have been blown. :OHow is it bias?
The referee shouldnt have added 4 minutes in the Manchester derby anyway - there wasn't enough (from what I recall) to warrant it.
Revealed: Manchester United get more injury time when they need it. Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea all get more time than Man U do though.By the looks of it, there is. How many referees have gifted you extra minutes when you aren't winning?
Lol Sunderland were unlucky but United were not lucky, funny that like. We restricted attacks with great defending but there is no changing your mind, you are probably a United fan that thought you were not lucky against Arsenal but maybe you can explain that to me as well. I await your words of wisdom(lol).
How is it bias?
Coming from a neutral, the referee DID con them out of it (If Arshavin hadn't've scored then here would be a blatant penalty not given, especially when at the other end RVP did the same and got a yellow for it)
Rooney DID dive, his knees started falling to the floor and he skipped over Almunia intending to make contact so that some contact was made, and then he could get the penalty.
The referee shouldnt have added 4 minutes in the Manchester derby anyway - there wasn't enough (from what I recall) to warrant it.
By the looks of it, there is. How many referees have gifted you extra minutes when you aren't winning?
Richardson kicked the ball softly to where the free kick should've been taken, Rooney protests to the referee, and as he plays for United, he gets his way. Free kick proceeds to be taken 10 yards away from where the foul was made.
sunderland where unlucky because they deserved to win, but utd wherent lucky, they are class it was a typical utd moment never giving up always going, and the quality utd have over sunderland proved to be the case for the goal, they why utd scored as they have better players then sunderland. thts how sunderland can play on of there skins and utd can play the worst they have played at home for about 6-7 years and still get a result
you make no sense. you tell me to take a leaf out of andi and keith's book and admit we were lucky yet in the post you quoted i admitted we were lucky. i didn't mention arsenal.
your bias:
You still insist you were conned by the referee against us.
you claimed rooney dived against you when almunia blatantly made contact.
you claimed the ref conned city with the extra time when it turned out he was right.
you seem to think there is a pro united conspiracy with all refs.
you claimed richardson shouldn't have been sent off when he was obviously time wasting.
there are many others i can't quite remember.
fletcher is not a hatchet man. i'm not saying he is an angel but he doesn't start a match with the intention of kicking the other players off the pitch.