REAVER !

FM14SERBIA question is very interesting.
Slightly higher and higher has not the same pressing, have i true ?

Is the 4-2-3-1 always the best between 4-2-3-1, 4-1-2-2-1 and 4-2-3-1 narrow ?
 
Last edited:
I see you are constantly updating the Tactics, which tactic would you say is the best for a Top Team and which is better for a Lower league side ?
 
lightostekmegi said:
Game version 17.2.1

I started the league with Trabzonspor. Media sequencing 4 or 5. FIRED. My tactic V14. V13 and V14 not working on every team.
Click to expand...

Is it 100% fluid?


Impossible not to work, I have tested in several times. It works, but it should be 100%, its squad must have good morale, the team must respect its reputation, etc ... There are variables that determine, what I can say is that the tactic is phenomenal
 
FM14SERBIA said:
Hey TFF :)

I have a question for you about Defensive Line :) I hope you will understand my question :)

4-2-3-1 Slightly Higher Defensive Line and 4-1-2-2-1 Slightly Higher Defensive Line is not same ?


4-2-3-1 Distance between Half Line to Slightly Higher Defensive Line is about 8m (26,25 feet)

View attachment 1098981


4-1-2-2-1 Distance between Half Line to Slightly Higher Defensive Line is about 16m (52,50 feet)

View attachment 1098982



4-1-2-2-1 with Higher Defensive Line is about 7m (22,97 feet) from the Half Line.

View attachment 1098987


So 4-2-3-1 Slightly Higher Defensive Line (8m) and 4-1-2-2-1 Higher Defensive Line (7m) it must be almost same :)

If this is true , why do you use for 4-1-2-2-1 Slightly Higher Defensive Line (16m) and why not Higher Defensive Line (7m)
Click to expand...

It depends on the team shape, mentality, closing down setting and on the formation. Since the first 3 things are the same here, it is different due to the formation. The question was why the 41221 is not using Higher D-line, I think the answer is it would also affect the positioning of the IFs and striker and the whole tactic will be too aggressive and played very high on the pitch.
 
Last edited:
BeautifulPlay said:
FM14SERBIA question is very interesting.
Slightly higher and higher has not the same pressing, have i true ?

Is the 4-2-3-1 always the best between 4-2-3-1, 4-1-2-2-1 and 4-2-3-1 narrow ?
Click to expand...


Hmmm maybe :) but you can change the pressing instructions with Team instructions or Players instructions :) So you can play with High Defensive Line and the same time you can add Closing Down Less or Closing Down Much Less for players :)
 
Last edited:
Poor tactic

I got very poor results with Tottenham. Completely destroyed by other strong teams and draws and looses with weaker ones.
 
dan marius mitu said:
Which is the best version of this tactic?
Click to expand...
You should go with the latest of the 4231. For 41221 Vortex V6 is still killing it, but the newest looks kinda like it so might even be better with the current full back setup
 
CodeX said:
You should go with the latest of the 4231. For 41221 Vortex V6 is still killing it, but the newest looks kinda like it so might even be better with the current full back setup
Click to expand...
Which version is that from the 4231. Works tge 41221 V6 good?
 
Loving v15. Scoring for fun and barely conceding. Defo the most balanced of all Reaver tactics so far!
 
FM14SERBIA said:
Hey TFF :)

I have a question for you about Defensive Line :) I hope you will understand my question :)

4-2-3-1 Slightly Higher Defensive Line 4-1-2-2-1 Slightly Higher Defensive Line is not same
Click to expand...

Hey mate,

"Slightly higher" seemed working better for the 4-2-3-1 tactic but after some testing I changed my mind and tweaked the D-Line in the 4-2-3-1 tactic.






******

THE 4-2-3-1 TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V16



CHANGES:

- tweaked the D-Line

- tweaked the closing down settings of AML/AMC/AMR positions
​








bump
TotalFootballFan9 said:
*******

THE 4-2-3-1 TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V15

THE 4-1-2-2-1 TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V9

THE PPMS HAVE BEEN UPDATED (STC/AMC/MCL/MCR - POSITIONS)

THE ATTRIBUTES AND TRAINING HAVE BEEN UPDATED (STC - POSITION)








CHANGES ( 4-2-3-1 Version) :

- changed the role/duty STC position

- changed the duty of AMC position








CHANGES ( 4-1-2-2-1 Version) :

- changed the roles/duty of STC positions

- changed the roles/duties of MCL/MCR positions
​
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
hey tff, mate first thanks alot for your tactics, can you see which tactic is better.. destroyer or raver
 
tzahy said:
hey tff, mate first thanks alot for your tactics, can you see which tactic is better.. destroyer or raver
Click to expand...

Hey mate,

4-2-3-1 V16 tactic and Destroyer V5 show very close results and I still can't say with 100% confidence which of them is better, I can only say the 4-1-2-2-1 tactc is lagging behind of those two tactics.
 
hai TTF, thanks for ur tactic and guidance that u share to us. But kindly, sometimes when im using this tactic 4231, i had some problem when facing a full defensive tactic. My player cannot find the net with a lot of shoot to opponents. Can u make tactic to face the team with full defensive tactic?
THank you mate :)
 
Estas táticas cada vez estão piores... Os meus resultados estão a piorar de atualização para atualização...
 
TotalFootballFan9 said:
******

THE 4-2-3-1 TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V16



CHANGES:

- tweaked the D-Line

- tweaked the closing down settings of AML/AMC/AMR positions
​
Click to expand...



TotalFootballFan9 said:
*******

THE 4-2-3-1 TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V15

THE 4-1-2-2-1 TACTIC HAS BEEN UPDATED TO V9

THE PPMS HAVE BEEN UPDATED (STC/AMC/MCL/MCR - POSITIONS)

THE ATTRIBUTES AND TRAINING HAVE BEEN UPDATED (STC - POSITION)






CHANGES ( 4-2-3-1 Version) :

- changed the role/duty STC position

- changed the duty of AMC position





CHANGES ( 4-1-2-2-1 Version) :

- changed the roles/duty of STC positions

- changed the roles/duties of MCL/MCR positions
​
Click to expand...




Hello,

Could someone upload V16 here?

Thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

FMBase

Beta

Resources

Back
Top