Well hang on just a second. This isn't stuff you should be teaching to ten year olds: how on Earth can you possibly explain all the socio-political causes and effects of the 9/11 tragedy to someone who's below the age of about fifteen?
Maybe in secondary school, but frankly my experiences with historical education as a recently finished pupil of secondary level education was patchy at best. I can honestly say I learnt about five times as much outside of school about history than I did inside it. They don't teach you about too much that's actually relevant or useful. They tend to focus on specific historical hotspots, and I think the 9/11 bombings, whilst significant, are too vague and time-consuming towards the curriculum to justify including.
Quite apart from that, what real purpose would it serve? I'd rather kids get a working knowledge of British and world history, one that covers more than just historical points of interest, rather than wasting time going through all the reasons why 9/11 happened.
didn't mean primary schools (which I should've mentioned), as obviously a 10 year old child is pretty much not going to understand. The main point I was making tbh was just the fact that schools are just starting to skip significant events. Wouldn't expect them to go into detail as to why 9/11 happened as that would just go down so many different paths and become convoluted, but it just seems wrong that nowadays there's a lot of historical evens (such as WWII) that are now becoming very diluted. The school I went to in Scotland in 1990 was absolutely fantastic, and I learned a **** of a lot. Nowadays, it's coming across as if the teachers just don't seem that bothered. One of the kids finished high school and knows next to nothing about WWII or the Roman Empire.