i agree with this,too many kids making silly threads,attracting older members would be nice,some older mods aswell would be good no offence to existing mods
What would you class as older mods?
i agree with this,too many kids making silly threads,attracting older members would be nice,some older mods aswell would be good no offence to existing mods
What would you class as older mods?
I think the rating system for files (shortlists/tactics/database's) etc should to changed.
my suggetion is that you must have downloaded the file before you rate it and also it would be a lot more helpful if you had to leave a comment in order to rate a file.
I say this because I know there are some users on this site who deliberately give bad ratings and comments to other peoples files in order to make their files look better and get more downloads.
for example I uploaded a well tested good database which had taken the best part of two days to create earlier today and within 10 minutes of it being on the base someone had already rated it with an F, there is no way someone could have downloaded it, started a new game and tested in in that time.
i think he means less people like oneunited and more valid threads and posts being made, dnt make difference what age a mod is long as there good
it was in the general chat section and no one was being forced to read it or post on it. its not like i made a thread entitled " lionel messi " :S
i agree with this,too many kids making silly threads,attracting older members would be nice,some older mods aswell would be good no offence to existing mods
The Admin team and all of the Super Mods are 21/22 or older....
I think the rating system for files (shortlists/tactics/database's) etc should to changed.
my suggetion is that you must have downloaded the file before you rate it and also it would be a lot more helpful if you had to leave a comment in order to rate a file.
I say this because I know there are some users on this site who deliberately give bad ratings and comments to other peoples files in order to make their files look better and get more downloads.
for example I uploaded a well tested good database which had taken the best part of two days to create earlier today and within 10 minutes of it being on the base someone had already rated it with an F, there is no way someone could have downloaded it, started a new game and tested in in that time.
I can see the pictures in your story still.
To be fair, databases should really be more thought out and thoroughly done - they aren't graphics, and should take over two days. You shouldn't have a poll on which databases to do next, you should think them out properly, like LFC Marshall or Eds. Churning them out at the rate you do is helpful to nobody - sure you've got some good ideas, you should just focus on them a little longer......
What about a team guilds sub-section?
Not really enough of them about to merit a section. If we did introduce one, it would no doubt result in 500 half arsed guides being made.
There are a few good ones around. GodCubed's Villa one comes to mind.True, we always get asked to do a team guides section. But most of the 'guides' people right on here are just a run down of the club info and maybe mentioning who there best player is...wow. They're not needed really.
There are a few good ones around. GodCubed's Villa one comes to mind.
If there was a section I think it would encourage more people to contribute and write more guides. Obviously some sort of standard would need to be in place however.
Not really enough of them about to merit a section. If we did introduce one, it would no doubt result in 500 half arsed guides being made.