R
Reconnected
Guest
Sounds good. What team are you playing with ?
Real Madrid. I've made some small changes with the tactic though.
Sounds good. What team are you playing with ?
Regarding the approach, the issue I see when facing teams attacking you is the big gap you leave on your left side. Your team is dropping deep but yet you have a ballwinner that will burst forward to close down their central Mids in their build up. If, or rather when, they get passed him, they have a open freeway of space to exploit behind him. No winger,no DMC, just a DC and DL sitting deep and being passive.
Here, I would probably have pushed up the team and retained possession.
Start of by doing this.
- Look at the team- What players are you forced to leave out due to the formation rather than the roles ?
- Look at their stats rather than their reputation irl
- Look again at their stats regarding: Decision, Anticipation, Off the Ball/Positioning( both for MR and central mids), Work Rate, Bravery, Determination
- Now, imagen what kind of approach you are more likely to use ( here, its standard rather than Counter)
With this info, think about if this approach actually gets the best out of your squad ( I am not so sure).
The Strikers
YOu should use the False nine or any supporting role when using Standard and Attack, not a poacher.
Hazard/Mata
If woudl use Hazard as the Shadow Striker. Mata, I am unsure of, perhaps sell him
Thanks for sharing, Am trying the 451 for a lower rated team (blackburn) do you still think its works well for these type teams?
I notice the duties (support, attack, defend) are different on the counter tactic, however you can use the same player instructions when this is such so how do you have the player instructions for the counter? thinking more about the right back and right mid
Update:
In the game against Athletic i won the shots with 18(11)-3(2). Against M?laga i won the shots with 20(14)-5(2).
View attachment 398210
Looks good. What kind of changes did you make ?
TBH on the wide 4-5-1...is there anything I can do if my LB has great attacking abilites and I feel like im wasting his talents playing him as FB-Support? Same with my RB, not so great attacking attacking abilities and I feel like im asking him to more than he can handle.
I know you might say just flip the tactic but I couldn't do that because my attacking players in front are set and I couldn't switch them.
Any ideas?
You could try to give them the roles that suits them the best. After all, that is probably a better choice than not using them correctly
but won't that unbalance the tactic?
I am going to give this a try with Wolves. I am yet to use a tactic which gets the best out of the should be awesome in League One Leigh Griffiths. I also think this will suit Doyle in the DF role and with the emphasis on wide play and high tempo too.
Sounds good. You might want to have a look an more attacking, yet probing, approach to go with it. Look in this thread where I have uploaded 2 versions for a user ( the compact 442 you already have so download the other one "a.tac".
http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/what-tactic-should-i-use-fm-14/142940-manchester-city-tactic.html
That is brilliant TBH, thankyou. Is the style of it similar in terms of player types? At work at the moment so cannot view.