There's two things I wish to comment here about this match:
- The first goal by Messi. He's done something I keep saying would make a striker go way above in results: When he arrives to the ball, most players (and public) would go "wooo, in front of goal, easy chance, just shoot now!". With a goalkeeper in front that makes for a chance that is somewhere from okay to poor. If he had shot there, Bravo would've parried it (it's what he tried, expecting Messi to shoot), but instead Messi did one of the two best choices when one has the ball near goal and the keeper is still ahead: dribble the keeper. The other choice is to look for a pass.
- The second is to ask what do the commentators smoke. When Bravo made the handball one of them said "Bravo had no choice". WTF, man? He had the perfect choice to let it pass and hope for the defender to get to the ball before it got to goal (in fact, I think that would've happened as I think that lob was not fast enough to get into goal before being intercepted) or simply letting it pass accepting the goal, with the thought it'd be better level the match with eleven players from two goals down than come back from one goal down with only ten players. On top of the mere fact that, even if City couldn't hope to come back in this match, this is a league phase and it was better to bet on keeping the 2-0 with eleven men, then hope for some surprising result in the second leg than to risk the likely, and turned real, thrashing that makes that possibility to get ahead of Barcelona if they are tied in points completely null. Had it been the second leg in a play off or the final and then sure, I'd understand in the moment you can think it's better to hope a lucky equalizer one man down than two goals down, when having that poor match.