Not blaming anyone more than telling it like it actually happened. Said the same the Utd thread Sat'day which got V's back-up. If he looks at it objectively a few days removed he couldn't deny Utd seriously rode their luck helped out massively by Pawson.
We had a bad start compounded by what Moss did at City with the knock-on for a month or so. No Sadio for three games, with no Coutinho, still regaining his fitness after the lil' ***** took a month off, and form and confidence went to ****. Since the Tottenham walloping in October, we're running 2/3 games clear of you over the last 5 months which is testimony to how much we've improved as the season had gone on and just how good our form has been over the last 5/6 months. (****, Sat'day was different. That wasn't a side that threw the towel in as previous L'pool sides would have done. They came out and had Utd looking like an away team, at home, hanging on for dear life. Just off in the final third. But on another day, it's highly unlikely he'd of dogged out the victory.). This was part of a German report on Saturday's game. The highlighted last line sums it up:
'The level of this match wasn’t remarkably high, as Klopp’s team weren’t coerced into playing poorly by the tactics of Mourinho. Thanks to Marcus Rashford’s clinical display in front of goal, Mourinho was able to exercise his version of control over the match. This version of control doesn’t actually do all that much to “control” the game, instead stifling the opponent into being less effective than normal. Still, Liverpool in the second half were quite close to finding a second, with United owing a debt of gratitude to Eric Bailly. In another day where the front three are more effective and less so from Rashford, the narrative on Mourinho shifts from “pragmatic genius” to “cowardly in big matches”.
Totally encompasses why Utd are going absolutely nowhere under him. When given the talent available, you should be. And let's be brutally honest, if de Gea wasn't the WC 'keeper he is, Utd would quite plausibly be sitting alongside Arsenal right now. He's continually that big a difference maker bailing his manager out of the ****.
Thing is z, going forward, his brand of football is never going to get close to winning the PL today. Or the EC for that matter. The games moved on and points totals are going up season-on-season. L'pool, like City, play to win every game they play. Your fella', not so much. He's not adapted and never will. Sat'day's two mistakes aside, since Klopp's tweaked his tactics, along with finally dumping the single biggest thing holding this sdie back, the goalkeeper, and adding van Dijk who's organisation has lead to a wholly different defensive shape, which side is gonna' be moving forward again next year whilst the other stagnates? Our defence (which was never as bad as was made out. Mignolet just highlighted every little mistake into a goal more or less), could always be fixed. No matter what you spend on attacking talent, he doesn't change a career MO, nottin' is ultimately gonna' change.
The side playing the second best football in this Country, and some of the best Europe wide, is far more a threat going forward than the side continuing to think winning wars of attrition is the way forward sat in second.
Still happily congratulate you on the win. I don't happen to think we deserved much of anything. But I know as a fan of either coming out the ground Sat'day which one I'd be far more worried on. And had Pawson given him what he deserved, the complete relief at the final whistle would have turned very nasty toward him indeed.