Theatre of Dreams83
Member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2017
- Messages
- 29,713
- Reaction score
- 2,340
- Points
- 113
Luke Shaw: Manchester United defender could face Watford a week after concussion - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45502131
Apparently United have an advanced care unit that reduces the time required.
There's no such thing as reducing the time required. 6 days is a mandatory period for the concussion protocol. You cannot go faster than 6 days. Simple as that.
Yeah I read it as a 14 Day stand down UNLESS requirements were met, in which case it MAY be reduced. So Utd meet the medical requirements to reduce the stand down from 14-days, as per the FA guidelines.
Luke Shaw: Manchester United defender could face Watford a week after concussion - http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/45502131
Apparently United have an advanced care unit that reduces the time required.
If that’s correct then English football continues to be a complete joke in disregarding the seriousness of head injuries.
As Mike said above, you can’t rush a concussion. The protocol is there for a reason or else what’s the point?
You don’t F with head injuries. You just don’t. Guys health should always be paramount.
Playing a lad that was down that length of time concussed a week on? I’m no MD (although I have had the worst experience of delayed concussion withbtge worst possible outcome), but any player should be held out of the next game with that severity and timeframe to me.
I get that there’s no set process for a recovery as there’s varying degree’s of concussion but that’s lax to me and the protocol needs a review in that case IMHO. (As there does regardless in a lot of this. Like having a specialised neurotrauma guy at all games to fully ***** players who have head injuries. Still far too many allowed to continue in a game.).
Also the team doctors, and independent medical staff at games are trained looking for the signs of concussion. Hence the HIA assessment in Rugby.
I never thought it was a club protocol mate. I know the FA dictated criteria.
I just don’t agree that it’s stringent enough when it comes to head injuries.
I never thought it was a club protocol mate. I know the FA dictated criteria.
I just don’t agree that it’s stringent enough when it comes to head injuries.
Why would you need a specific protocol for coming out of a sport concussion, though.
Because it is nigh on impossible to predict long-term effects of even a minor concussion. So the protocol is basically, a graduated return to activity, starting with some testing to assess, then light aerobic where patient's mobility, balance, coordination etc are all monitored closely along with cardiac performance and reactions.
Then stepped up a bit further. Monitored, tested etc.
Simply a way to assess whether or not the brain has fully recovered from the rattling it received. For player safety long term, the 'stand-down' period protects the player from being pushed back into action too early where further damage may occur.
While concussion is bad enough, the long-term effects of secondary concussion are quite frightening - a bruised brain, not fully recovered, can be re-injured without any significant external contact - normal movement of the head can re-injure in many situations.
So while the RTP protocol governs when a player can return to the field, it is just as much about the prevention of further, far more serious repercussions.
A player can play, without too much problem, before having fully recovered from a pulled hamstring for example, because if it goes again, it can still be repaired.
If the brain 'goes again' it can't. So you get the "Probably get 20 minutes out of him boss" when returning from a hammy, but a "Definately not" when recovering from a brain injury.
Was it Taylor Twerman, played for USA, had to stop playing because of repetitive concussion? Before the RTP protocol was developed? I know he was quite vocal about the need for it.