The Premier League Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve*
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 10K
  • Views Views 1M
Window net spend sans any confirmation of Sakho, Drinkwater etc tomorrow.

View attachment 1126590

Just shows outside of City how hard clubs have found it to get deals done.

Shows how much dead-wood City had to flog out.

Happy with United's window. 3/4 targets landed. We missed Perisic, they missed Sanchez, but both Manchester clubs can be very happy with their early work.

Liverpool had a decent window too. Kept Coutinho, added pace up top, sorted LB long term. Needed a CB though.
 
Last edited:
Window net spend sans any confirmation of Sakho, Drinkwater etc tomorrow.

View attachment 1126590

Just shows outside of City how hard clubs have found it to get deals done.
Huddersfield got in 13 players along with Watford so some teams didn't have much of a challenge, Brighton also added quite a few but fear for them with none of them being a striker
 
Huddersfield got in 13 players along with Watford so some teams didn't have much of a challenge, Brighton also added quite a few but fear for them with none of them being a striker

Sorry. I should have clarified at the top end of the market.

I didn't bother as there's very few regulars outside of fans of the top 6 clubs who are shopping in a completely different market but I forget how people pick up on non-specifics here. My bad.
 
Shows how much dead-wood City had to flog out.

Happy with United's window. 3/4 targets landed. We missed Perisic, they missed Sanchez, but both Manchester clubs can be very happy with their early work.

Liverpool had a decent window too. Kept Coutinho, added pace up top, sorted LB long term. Needed a CB though.

Yeah but even at that, it was an all mighty struggle for Utd this summer.

You're currently sat with a CB he doesn't yet trust to play. Although everyones happy and he's started out scoring, a second choice striker. (Cue people claiming he was the target all along but that's purely on who you believe. With some very reputable journalists saying the complete opposite on Morata.). And only dropping lucky on the DM down to Chelse bizarrely handing one to you on a plate.

No club outside of City readily willing to well over pay to get their guys has had an easy window getting players the top end of the market.

And that goes across Europe for anyone not called PSG.
 
Thats the curse of the English money. Everyone in Europe knows you have it, so a bang average player's price goes up and a raw gem ain't worth taking a risk on as it might not work out. No wonder premier league clubs especially the promoted sides were struggling in the market.
 
Thats the curse of the English money. Everyone in Europe knows you have it, so a bang average player's price goes up and a raw gem ain't worth taking a risk on as it might not work out. No wonder premier league clubs especially the promoted sides were struggling in the market.

The £92 million Monaco ended up wanting today was ridiculous for a 20-year old that's done nottin' the game and is still developing potential. Albeit excellent potential at that.

Mad that he wanted to come. Everything had been agreed with the player but they wanted more than the £75 million on the table. Because, like you say, they know we have it.

Frustrating but happy the club walked away from that one. Every player has to have a price before it just get's stupid.
 
You can't use that logic to say Victor was a bad signing though, if that's the case, Mkhitaryan was too. Only time will tell.

We chose to sign Lukaku for a fee we refused to raise to for Morata, the ball was in our court. It wasn't as if Morata didn't want to come, or Madrid wouldn't sell to us - they just wanted more than we felt he was worth. Forced them into selling Morata for less than they felt he was worth, so joke was on them. Also suggests Lukaku was very much an equal alternative if Jose was willing to abandon Morata and pay extra for Rom. Also, if you look back early doors, I was one of the few United fans on here that was always happy to sign Lukaku.

Matic was 2nd choice DM, I agree - but surely it's not lucky if he was always a target? It's not as if we never considered him/had him shortlisted and Chelsea just called us one day and said "hey you want Nemanja?" - We made him want to come, just like you say Klopp does for every target you're linked with. I'm also sure as **** glad we signed the Serb instead of Dier. Just say worst case scenario, it went pear shaped, we always had Fabinho to fall back on as 3rd choice, who didn't move anywhere but like everyone, has a price.
 
You're picking your signings apart and I'm not debating whether it was a good or bad window.

I'm saying Utd struggled to get signings over the line like every club has. Apart from City who just don't care about paying well over the odds to secure a deal.

Been the theme of the window. When £75 million doesn't get you a 20-year old it say's it all.
 
Exactly Scouse the only clubs that landed their targets were the likes of City and PSG. I mean we were interested in Mendy but 52million for a LB who is essentially an auxilary winger. PSG just payed 100 mill plus for an 18 yr old ffs.
 
EPL clubs really have to work together to ensure they do not overpay for players. Once you start to do so, foreign clubs will start to gouge us everytime. Explains the massive penny pinching that was ongoing at United, Chelsea and Liverpool. Only City were fine with getting taken for a ride each time.
 
Confirmed. It will end at 5pm on the Thursday before the season starts.

DJH8vjbXgAEW98f.jpg
 
I think it's a good decision, but very dangerous to insert release clauses now, since teams from other leagues can leave you struggling to put up a team starting September.
 
Remember this?

[video=youtube;_Zi_uCcfA8s]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Zi_uCcfA8s[/video]

Fun interview with Boruc just came out. He says before that game he had an offer on the table from a top 4 PL club and some high level people from that club were on the stadium watching. 15 seconds in and he concedes a goal from another goalkeeper.
 
I think it's a good decision, but very dangerous to insert release clauses now, since teams from other leagues can leave you struggling to put up a team starting September.
Dont think English teams have them do they? I agree though good decision imo.
 
Dont think English teams have them do they? I agree though good decision imo.

From an article I read:

Only a few Premier League transfers have been reported to have included release clauses. This was the case with the Demba Ba transfer from Newcastle to Chelsea and Joe Allen from Swansea to Liverpool In the case of Allen, reports were that the bid could only trigger the release clause if it came from one of five clubs that included Liverpool.
 
Back
Top